Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
waqf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
631.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Matrix hasn't gone anywhere ( http://matrix.itasoftware.com/ ). And it still does things that Google Flights doesn't (such as working outside North America).
632.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
We'll always be able to find something which is still expensive. And everything has scaling limits. For example our "essentially unlimited" energy source might give us enough to power a 21st-century lifestyle essentially free, but might
633.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Better to do six months/six months (stupid income tax).
634.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
> managerial incomplete I'm guessing you wrote this post using autocompetence?
635.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Voting is mandatory in Australia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system_of_Australia#...
636.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
> why would an attacker bother to actually show a user they were being manipulated? Because the person who wishes to tamper with the outcome of the election only has access to (or, very likely, skillz to modify) the calibration template
637.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Is this a reputable journal? It seems to be from the same publisher ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCIRP ) as Advances in Pure Mathematics , which recently accepted a paper written by a random text generator.
638.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I believe your contract is unjust. While I can't speak for you personally, I believe many people sign such contracts without regard to their justness, because they don't have market power to renegotiate the contract. And I believe that un
639.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Firstly, breaking a contract is not "illegal". The ISP's recourse is probably limited to terminating the contract. Secondly, just because it's written in the contract doesn't mean it's legally enforceable. Thirdly, just because it's legall
640.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Maybe you should stop following geeky, low-brow people?
641.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
benatkin means that speech is no longer free if you can't express things that you're afraid to put your name to. (You clarified this even more when you said in another thread (paraphrased) that people could say anything they " should " say
642.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Downvoted because I disagree with you.
643.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
> Considering that most of the comments here are in response to him, his comment clearly added to the discussion. By your criterion, how would one distinguish between someone "adding to the discussion" and a troll? Or is it your positi
644.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I remember when it was not the case (and I remember a period when say 90% of the time you just got straight links, 10% you got redirect links with no Javascript trickery hiding them). But yes, it has been this way for years.
645.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
It is possible that you could generate a better 'pedia than Wikipedia simply by datamining the version history of a Wikipedia article and trying to resurrect, or piece together, a better version of the article from the previous versions. It
646.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Small point: Teletext is not the "German" system, it's the generic name for the service. The UK had several Teletext services, such as Ceefax (BBC channels) and Oracle (independent channel). Similarly ARDText and ZDFtext are German Telet
647.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
The human ear is not equally sensitive to different frequencies, and it's most sensitive at a fairly narrow band at a few kHz. If you don't correct for that when synthesizing your tones, then one pitch may be much more prominent than the ot
648.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
That sounds like a serious accusation. Can you provide a citation?
649.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Speaking of radiotherapy overdoses, gnosis above provided an article about some more recent cases: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/29/health/29radiation.html?_r... ;
650.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I disagree with your emphasis of "hospitals", because I think of hospitals as much more dangerous and threatening than airports. Your odds per visit of being killed by hospital-acquired infections alone are hugely greater than all forms of
651.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I think they are trying to avoid arguments over whether there's 2.9oz or 3.1oz of liquid in that 5oz bottle.
652.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Is it really such a moat? Probably other people are trying to build autonomous cars but have the sense not to talk about it.
653.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
> the ability for an artist to sell enough music to live on gets exponentially harder. For that argument to make sense, you have to assume that an artist has a right to make a living selling music. If you believe that then the status q
654.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Too cold to be habitable, though, surely? So it doesn't affect the OP's point.
655.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Officially announcing things that "everybody knows" already can still make a difference. It means that you can ask Google executives about those things in public appearances and they'll at least acknowledge the question even if they refuse
656.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I was following a URL that apparently was supposed to go to a specific subpage, not to the site homepage. And apparently there was a loginwall in front of that subpage. What good would clicking around the site have done? If you think I wa
657.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
Not instantaneously: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_gravity
658.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
I'm not logging in with Facebook to see your site, about which I know nothing, when you haven't even sold me on its relevance to the topic under discussion.
659.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
It's confusing because several algorithms are explained, but I believe they're actually floats in this version. Also it's not a normal PDE because ∂f/∂t is permitted to be an arbitrary functional of f restricted to a fixed-diameter neighbor
660.
▲
by
waqf
14y ago
You're arguing for eating our seed corn. Yesterday's maths drove today's technology. Today's maths will drive tomorrow's technology, unless you have your way.
More ›