Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wamatt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
301.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Two issues: 1)Having insights and owning bitcoins can be mutually independent variables. In other words, it's entirely possibly you have it completely backward, and that upon arriving at a lengthy deliberation, some rational actors, are th
302.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
The implicit assumption that there is a bitcoin bubble, is not a fact. Was the .com speculation the last two decades a bubble? Is Facebook stock circa 2007 a bubble? etc Rational arguments can be both ways and I'd be wary of anyone selling
303.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
The difference between a normal currency and bitcoin with regards to deflation is that bitcoin is almost infinitely divisible, whereas traditional currencies are not. Divisibility acts in opposition to deflation to create liquidity. The ide
304.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>"It seems there's a hesitation of spending bitcoins knowing if you just wait a day it will go up" So this argument seems to be rather popular, and on the surface it does seems to make sense. However, it glosses over an important cons
305.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Curious, but why would Target care too much if the credit card was stolen? My understanding (which could be wrong) was the credit card companies or end users absorb the losses (depending on circumstances).
306.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
"no one has the ability to make the distinction between a quack and real medicine" (paraphrasing OP) What utter nonsense. If someone presented you with a homeopathic dropper [1] saying it would cure cancer vs a new gold nanoparticle exp
307.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Snark aside, we are somewhat in agreement. I tend to dislike elitist thinking (or though I'm still guilty of it at times), not for moral reasons, but simply because empiricism, in my admittedly subjective opinion, is routinely lauded over c
308.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>"lay people have essentially no ability to distinguish between potential 'last shots'" I'm sure you mean well, but this type of thinking really bothers me. For example, many of us here on HN, possess the critical reasoning skills to
309.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>That said, I immediately dug an old LightScribe CD recorder out of my junk bin to start playing around with making graphene sheets :-) You serious? Sounds interesting, do tell us more.
310.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Agreed. Additionally one might go as far to suggest false positives are more problematic than the occasional spam mail.
311.
▲
Planck's most detailed map ever reveals an almost perfect Universe
(phys.org)
1 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
312.
▲
JSShaper: JavaScript syntax tree shaping
(jsshaper.org)
3 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
313.
▲
Cree XLamp XM-L2 LEDs
(cree.com)
4 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
314.
▲
Greg's Cable Map
(cablemap.info)
2 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
315.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
I welcome your additional precision and those those are good points. However, I think that you should hold the word "never" to the same standard. I certainly used to preach the same view as you to anyone that would listen, but over the year
316.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Never ? The does seems like a strong word. It could be argued that there exists quite a few businesses built almost soley around credit cards for transactions and hence income. This in turn requires playing by Visa/Mastercard's rules, whic
317.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Nice to see more competition in this space. I've found newsletter email filtering to be a godsend and it's changed how I deal with email. I used to setup tons of filter rules manually, but now I just subscribe to anything of interest, and d
318.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
The author himself shows a little more humility: "You’re exactly right. This is a risk, an experiment. " -rob [1] . I find it incredible that you will not concede any significant difference between D3 and D2 or between K1 and K2 groups. Wh
319.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>And I am saying that just because you want to pretend there's magic pixie dust that we need to live, doesn't mean it is actually true. Another misrepresentation. I started the thread by saying that the human body can take a lot of ab
320.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>"No, it is arrogant to claim that you know everything and this guy is a total moron because he did a great job of 100% completely and totally covering all vitamins " Emotionally charged strawman. He's done some homework. My argumen
321.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
Not as far as nutrition is concerned. Some studies have indicated that D2 is slightly less potent, but the majority have shown equal efficacy. The evidence does not support that claim. If anything we don't know, and that's my point. [1]
322.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>When in reality, the human GI evolved to support an extremely broad range of inputs as it's most significant factor. While we can agree that innovation should not be stifled, the idea that we can determine the processes by which the
323.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
So it's obviously satire, and I'm a huge PG/YC supporter, although consider this: PG (through the voice of another YC faithful) is in a way attacking the "dullard VC", lampooning them for being formulaic and unimaginative. But, in a sense h
324.
▲
Thingsquare Mist - Connect Everything to the Internet
(thingsquare.com)
7 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
325.
▲
Caltech builds self healing chips
(phys.org)
1 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
326.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>Physicists would hardly be intimidated by being shown the algebra of Bayes's Theorem. Well no they probably wouldn't, but my point wasn't about intimidation and not sure how it's relevant. Personally I'm a huge fan of Bayes theory bo
327.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
>MWI certainly does make falsifiable claims. Would you mind stating an example of such a claim?
328.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
From your link: "This is Bayes's Theorem. I own at least two distinct items of clothing printed with this theorem, so it must be important." - Eliezer cringe . "Here's a bunch of math so I must be really smart. Trust me guys." Math i
329.
▲
by
wamatt
14y ago
> Since the Many Worlds Interpretation is the simplest one, it is also the most likely one The simplest defeasible claim in 2013, is still: "we don't know". Consider, 'How does the sun come up every day?' Answer A: God makes it happ
330.
▲
HTTP Archive tracks how the Web is built
(httparchive.org)
1 points
by
wamatt
14y ago
|
0 comments
More ›