waihtis

9 ms·

91.
by waihtis 2y ago
It's not, it's literally what it is. Per default, accumulating wealth contains risks for the individual attempting to do so, and increasingly more and more of the wealth is stripped away while reducing none of the risk. Thats abso
92.
by waihtis 2y ago
Are you incapable of differentiating between X (Twitter) the corporate and Elon Musk, the human entity?
93.
by waihtis 2y ago
Thank you, this is actually useful context
94.
by waihtis 2y ago
The legal dispute isn't with Elon Musk (the person) but X (Twitter) However, the judge is punishing Elon (the person) via collateral damage to his other businesses If you can't see any difference here I really can't help you
95.
by waihtis 2y ago
isnt it funny how its completely obvious, yet the mere mention of this attracts a downvote brigade on this site.
96.
by waihtis 2y ago
Minister of the Supreme Federal Court Alexandre de Moraes has frozen Starlink's bank accounts in regards to an ongoing complication between X (Twitter) and the state of Brazil. It should be noted these are two entirely different compan
97.
by waihtis 2y ago
protectionism is an optional downstream branch of self-sufficiency - being self-sufficient does not automatically imply that it will devolve into protectionism
98.
by waihtis 2y ago
> Protectionism and self-sufficiency is the same thing please revisit the dictionary
99.
by waihtis 2y ago
How so - Lidl created something for their own demand, and started selling it to externals and found demand. Nothing protectionist in that
100.
by waihtis 2y ago
Attackers win so easily because corporate security teams play predominantly 1) regulatory games 2) compliance games 3) CV optimization games 4) political games and finally 5) actual security work games within their organization
101.
by waihtis 2y ago
I wonder how ”moonbrah” Bryan Johnson will take this news
102.
by waihtis 2y ago
not that it means anything definitive, but Sinclair has been somewhat of a turbulent figure due to "overreaching claims" in the broader life extension research space: https://www.nmn.com/news/disgraced-david-s
103.
by waihtis 2y ago
This is true for almost anything. 99.9% of the people out there know, for example, that killing another person is illegal. Your logic makes no sense here
104.
by waihtis 2y ago
its hotel security though. they will not know what a flipper is apart from being a "hacking tool", and maybe they heard some other terms associated like "radio", "wifi", and whatever. They're just doing wh
105.
by waihtis 2y ago
My critique is having a largely inefficient middleman (EU) in distributing funds, and that it would likely be much more effective and transparent to have, say, business grants handled by the local governments. You did not address this at al
106.
by waihtis 2y ago
Feel free to refute anything I said instead of going into ad hominems.
107.
by waihtis 2y ago
Its pure theft for the purpose on enriching bureaucrats and other middlemen. Spin it how you want but the source of the funds is tax money collected from EU nations.
108.
by waihtis 2y ago
Worth remembering EU funding is collected from the nations that participate. In other words, our tax money is paid into the money pool, application consultants eat 10-30% of it and then it gets paid back to those who can afford to pay consu
109.
by waihtis 2y ago
I'm not fully qualified to talk of the OS side, however the commercial side has some ridiculous ideas. For instance, I once looked at a R&D program for commercial software for which one of the cornerstone criteria was that you HAD
110.
by waihtis 2y ago
> Who starts an article, especially one questioning responsibility with the lines in the sort of "woman-owned, queer- and POC-driven ... " ?? Exactly those type of orgs which exist primarily to fill this quota. Any kind of capa
111.
by waihtis 2y ago
wait until we get the politicians dream, the chat control bill, not only will Brussels shrug off everything but you'll enjoy a suitable penalty for criticizing them
112.
by waihtis 2y ago
Exactly so, EU has been incredibly hostile towards small business for a while now
113.
by waihtis 2y ago
NixOS may be legitimate, but the amount of BS funded under these EU programs is atrocious. The application processes are wildly untransparent, run by local bureaucrats under multiple layers of abstraction. I won't suggest anything here
114.
by waihtis 2y ago
That and this response is filled with appeals to emotion, but extremely thin on any actual details on the contract. I dont know the company but this statement makes them sound like a bunch of amateurs, and I’m now inclined to believe Defcon
115.
Defcon Response to Badge Issues(twitter.com)
18 points by waihtis 2y ago|1 comments
116.
by waihtis 2y ago
Wild, but not surprising. Heard a lot of bad stuff from the village heads some years ago already about DC organization.
117.
by waihtis 2y ago
Interestingly, most of the released Russians are in one way or another involved in cybercrime, including hacking, crypto and other malicious ops.
118.
Cyber Deception vs. Honeypots(defusedcyber.com)
1 points by waihtis 2y ago|0 comments
119.
by waihtis 2y ago
That really just proves my point.
120.
by waihtis 2y ago
Regulations are a big reason why this happened, sure, but also it hit the companies with great security budgets more. Hospitals, for instance, weren't that widely affected as they barely have any money to buy security tooling. Silver l

More ›