Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wagwang
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
So what, china in 1975 was a completely destroyed country, comparable to north korea
122.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Lots of miracles and exceptions in a working theory
123.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Sure if you water down the term of imperialism then yes. It is then incumbent on you to prove "imperialism" among the worst performers economically. What imperialism plagues liberia and ethiopia and honduras and papua new guinea
124.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
This world view is just wrong from top to bottom. Between 1945-1970, China was in a much worser state that any of those 3rd world countries in many aspects. Are you saying post 1970, the reason why these countries did not develop as fast as
125.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Opinions are valid but also worthless. Just give me a funny tweet to digest the situation.
126.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
The article literally says that tesla depreciates the least among evs.
127.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
You're assuming all economic activity is good activity. Billionaire spend allocates capital to frivolous garbage that does not improve human experience.
128.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
I'm more talking about how hoarded money has no effect until its spent, at which point the consumption tax kicks in. I.e. it's not really a regressive tax because you are taxed based on how you live, not how you can live.
129.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
You need to start thinking about the economy in terms of goods and services instead of money. Hoarded money is dead money, it's actually anti inflationary. If there are 100 apples and everyone can afford 1 apple except for a rich perso
130.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Bad logic, if u dont consume then who cares if u have money.
131.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
What a dumb article, diseases are self-inflicted/random, no one cares.
132.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Sure but can we just all drop the pretense that sovereignty and property rights mean anything. The only thing that really matters is power and how you get it. You can do protectionism if you are powerful, you can take whatever you want if y
133.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
What about the suez canal or iranian oil fields
134.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
A korean meal is only limited by the size of the table. I've visited resturants in korea where there were no less than 30 plates that came out of 1 set meal.
135.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Our society will continue to feel the civilizational tax of not having enough kids unless AI doctor becomes a thing.
136.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Depending on the area you teach, you might just be a daycare worker.
137.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
its one step above horoscopes
138.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
If you actually define every inch of behavior, you are pretty much writing code. If there's any line in the PR that you can't instantly grok the meaning of, you probably haven't defined the full breadth of the behavior.
139.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Remote work is a detriment to almost every junior employee.
140.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
The median person does not have a investment account so that is completely moot. The bottom 50% probably owns less than 1% of stock in aggregate.
141.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Oh yea ur right.
142.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Whys PEI under new france lol, this map feels like engagement bait.
143.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
SFO traffic is not bad at all. Send them to LAX and we're talking.
144.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
For those who don't know, this is probably in response to the tucker carlson interview.
145.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Predict and create, that's all that matters.
146.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
I would expect people who doom about AI existential risks to not train cutting edge models and give them agentic freedom.
147.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
The hypocrisy is that they constantly doom about ai existential risks but theyre also constantly training stoa models.
148.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
I've never heard any argument that demonstrates any certainty around physicalism. I like the argument bcuz it sounds nice, but I would never ever claim to know it to be true. I mostly arrived at physicalism because there are eggregious
149.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
Can we just all admit there has basically been no real progress made to the mind-body problem. They all rest on metaphysical axioms of which no one has any proof of. Physicalism is about as plausible as solipsism. Exhibit a > Nagel begin
150.
▲
by
wagwang
1y ago
The amount of money banks create is determined by the appetite for credit which is determined by the interest rate. The fed has not been actively destroying money, they are at most slowing the rate of the increase of money.
More ›