Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
waffleiron
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
waffleiron
9mo ago
Because this is funded and published for the following reason: > FDD conducts in-depth research, produces accurate and timely analyses, identifies illicit activities, and provides policy options – all with the aim of strengthening U.S. n
32.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
North Korea, Israel, and Pakistan prove you wrong.
33.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
He does seem to be invading other countries without popular support? One can find a reason (especially post-hoc) to allow, or disallow, any intervention. The US in cases like this just picks whatever is convenient. Dictator matters here, bu
34.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
And I am a non-American with friends from the US that surely would be happy if someone assassinated Trump. That doesn't make it a good thing.
35.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
> Presumably US actions are backed by the people they consider to be legitimately elected representatives of Venezuelan government, and if so amount to little more than assistance in local law enforcement. So any country could just assig
36.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
That could be survival bias and smells of a multiple testing problem. Surely there would also be a few automated systems to that sometimes would be able to turn around a company.
37.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
Maybe you can give a bit of context why you feel that way? Dropping a 2+ hour, <2000 views, 4chan video without context isn’t really the type of comment HN is looking for as far as I can tell
38.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
Hong Kong Basic Law also required a national security law since 1997. Lets not be selective. > Article 23 is an article of the Hong Kong Basic Law. It states that Hong Kong "shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason
39.
▲
by
waffleiron
10mo ago
It doesn’t matter if its called Treason, for example the Rosenbergs were executed for espionage. Aiding and abetting what the US saw was foreign harm.
40.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Here in Germany the Honor foldable is 1700 and the air announced as 1200 but 1450 EUR if you want the same 512GB as the Honor.
41.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Unlike some other groups, that just get their rockets directly donated.
42.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
I am more on the privacy side of things like HIPAA, but I would like to link the following. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/january-2017-cyber-n...
43.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Why on hacker news when it comes to tech salaries, if they stay for a year the same everyone calls it a reduction due to inflation. However in cases of poor people and poverty there must be an ulterior motive.
44.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
In contrast the study that's linked by OP is funded by: Amazon, giant banks, ExxonMobile, Google, Microsoft, investment firms. https://www.nber.org/about-nber/support-funding
45.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Then they should pay them, in Germany a non-compete has to be compensated. A country might not want brain drain at all, is it then acceptable to stop people from leaving?
46.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Then you'll just add 15-30 minutes, and it will still work ;)
47.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
After the Snowden disclosures, not sure about that.
48.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
Maybe more likely that they just assume they are caught, or assume the likelihood of getting caught is higher when there is overt screening for North Koreans. Similar to why email scammers don’t need good grammar, filtering out difficult ca
49.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
>They are more concerned with social progressivism than the liberal foundations of our democracy That's absolutely not true In 2017 they filed a lawsuit defending conservative / far-right Milo Yiannopoulos [1] and spoke up for
50.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
There is not a single AI model that fully complies with GDPR. How can you inform everyone, even those not named by actual name but otherwise identifiable, that their data is being processed and give them the ability to object when the data
51.
▲
by
waffleiron
1y ago
> People really need to resist the urge to anthropomorphize corporations. I understand where you are coming from, but this also sounds like a way to remove individual responsibility from the people that make up a corporation.
52.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
Not "his source of information" instead it is used (as an example) to indicate how many sub-categorizations there are. From the guidelines: > Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A
53.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
Because they don’t want to have a strong competitor in case they come back, or gave they competitor enter other markets they are still active in. Also, not all (if any) companies that divested from Russia sold "their assets" inclu
54.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
Do note that HDI does indeed depend on some assumptions and those includes "equating earning more money with a "better life"" as GNI (PPP) per capita. With no further increases after 75k USD (International dollar), unad
55.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
Not sure, but as you can see from the pinned post of the account you linked, Elon even livestreams himself driving. Could it be related to not wanting to give too up to date information that could be business related? I am just guessing, bu
56.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
We should not longer have music festivals with this argumentation (as a random example from millions). People exactly know where and what time famous are at a specific location. Sure it might not be "highly accurate timing" but le
57.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
There literally was an curator of the British Museum that stole 1800 artifacts and sold them for personal profit. Don't pretend this doesn't happen to the British. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03
58.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
>The union has made it clear that they're not willing to entertain such discussions. That's not the same discussion. I am sure they are more than willing to turn docks into worker co-ops, then automate so it's a benefit to
59.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
Yup you are totally right for CA: > Exceptions (one-party consent required): (1) where there is no expectation of privacy, (2) recording within government proceedings that are open to the public, (3) recording certain crimes or communica
60.
▲
by
waffleiron
2y ago
>they're not legally entitled to much privacy in these places. While I think this is a really cool project, I also agree with the privacy issues. CA is a two party consent state, and recording a conversation (which this is likely to
More ›