w4

12 ms·

91.
by w4 3y ago
Same here (albeit Vue, not React). It’s excellent.
92.
by w4 4y ago
Sure. I also agree it's unreasonable. But it's not an interpretation. That's actually what the rule is now unless Congress acts to change it! EDIT: I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the IRS is not thrilled with the c
93.
by w4 4y ago
You're mixing up two different things here. There is no reward for R&D under this rule change. If anything it penalizes R&D, especially in the case of speculative ventures (startups, new product development, and so forth). The
94.
by w4 4y ago
I think that is broadly right in theory, yes, though the IRS isn’t saying that currently. They haven’t provided any guidance at all last I heard, in spite of being asked for it by industry groups many months ago. Setting aside the apparentl
95.
by w4 4y ago
> I would love to know what interest groups are working on this actively that I can support further Same. If you learn of any please drop a comment, and I will do the same!
96.
by w4 4y ago
Ask your CPA. Not a CPA and this isn't tax advice, but based on what I understand about the change you'll probably not be impacted if you're contracting for clients and not creating the software for yourself. Your clients wil
97.
by w4 4y ago
I am not a CPA, but my understanding from extensive discussions with one is: If the salaries contributed towards the development of new software it is an R&D expense. You must amortize them. Those salaries or contractor fees are not ded
98.
by w4 4y ago
Everyone commenting in this thread that R&D can be written off is working with outdated information and is not up to date with the current state of play. I had the exact same conversation with my CPA last month. They told me the same th
99.
by w4 4y ago
You don't have a choice anymore. It's required to be amortized as of FY22. I had the same conversation with my CPA in January. To make matters worse, failed or abandoned R&D projects can also no longer be written off, and must
100.
by w4 5y ago
How do any of these complaints support the need for "security checkpoints"? A city lacking a subway system altogether does not support your statement that transit systems need security checkpoints to keep out the "riff raff.&
101.
by w4 5y ago
> And public transportation won't be viable in the US until cities finally wrap their head around the reality that you need basic security checkpoints at entrances to discourage riff raff from getting in (like in China). It seems
102.
by w4 5y ago
> Code is law. Law is law, code is code. They're two very different things. Code can't prevent someone from using violence to force you to overturn a smart contract's decision. The law can because it's enforced by t
103.
by w4 5y ago
> I find it absolutely fascinating that your arguments are shot down on this board, because it's business, but that is literally what you're told on a constant basis if you want to go into the education field in the US. It’s
104.
by w4 5y ago
I’m not so sure. Running a business exposes you to tremendous personal risk, especially in a litigious country like the US. It’s also incredibly hard, most often fails, and typically confers less prestige than other much more reliable and s
105.
by w4 5y ago
1031 exchanges are not available to homeowners, they are exclusively available for investment properties. Homeowners receive a $250k/$500k tax shelter as discussed above.
106.
by w4 5y ago
> Consent implies the right to say no. US citizens can't just tell the US government they don't accept it. Yes they can. That’s literally what elections are for.
107.
by w4 5y ago
How does the government determine what the people need if the people do not engage with it, and vice-versa? The government is not a foreign occupying power, and we are not its passive consumers. In the US the citizens are the government,
108.
by w4 5y ago
The town government exists for the benefit and service of its residents. It is not a take it or leave it proposition. The author is a resident, and it is therefore entirely reasonable for them to petition the town government for some servic
109.
by w4 6y ago
> We do have most people looking at their phones while driving. We do nothing to prevent this. What? If you're talking about the US, we absolutely do prevent this. It's banned in many states, and cause to be pulled over and g
110.
by w4 7y ago
Why is this being downvoted? It’s accurate: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/bloomberg-spe...
111.
by w4 7y ago
> I haven't read the whole thread, but I am seeing him bitch about her credit score being higher -- from a single agency. There are other agencies which may have different info. If you read the thread, he was specifically told the
112.
by w4 7y ago
> I'd just like to point out that the yield curve inverted in 2018 [1] yet here we are. My understanding is that this inversion (the 2 year/10 year) is generally regarded as the most reliable indicator of recession. The media
113.
by w4 7y ago
> both of those things are general guidance and emphasis, but specifically not “go audit/prosecute this list of political enemies”, which is why I think any candidate that would have answered “I intend to uphold the rule of law and
114.
by w4 7y ago
> But in the recent debates we also discussed if candidates would prosecute Trump after he’s no longer a sitting President, apparently conveniently forgetting that it’s the DoJ, not the President, who decides who to prosecute. You’re m
115.
by w4 7y ago
After skimming the docs, I'm not sure why you'd want to choose Checkout over Elements in a lot of situations, other than getting some great design work for free with Checkout. The dev time to implement Elements doesn't look
116.
by w4 8y ago
The definition of "small business" varies a lot . You probably think of a locally owned dry cleaner or coffee shop when you hear the term "small business." I know that's what I think of when I hear the term. But in
117.
by w4 8y ago
> the ownership of real estate assets seems like a pretty archaic system of not easily inspected pieces of paper. Having a public, provable system for recording this information (and possibly other related info, e.g. liens) seems like i
118.
by w4 9y ago
Yes (so long as it's a Federal, and not State, official): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Making_false_statements
119.
by w4 10y ago
> Rosetta PPC backwards compatibility on Intel worked well Rosetta worked, but I don't know if I'd say it worked well . It was brutally slow to the point of being unusable with some apps on mid/low end Macs.
120.
by w4 10y ago
> in my opinion part of what would be best for his sons is for them to be playing with girls as well as boys Except they are - right in your comment you say: > it definitely looks like Mike doesn't discriminate against girls(s

More ›