vsareto

81 ms·

931.
by vsareto 6y ago
Pay isn't the issue for hospitals buying software, they are already paying big money to vendors. And they often can't take their money elsewhere because of contracts. I heard 10 years lock-in for an EHR solution. Lots of software
932.
by vsareto 6y ago
I'mma be an editor real quick: "Nueralink" in the 6th paragraph
933.
by vsareto 6y ago
It's a founder saying dumb things about his own product. That's incredibly worrying since he holds all of the access to all of the employees to get his facts straight - it's obvious he just didn't make use of that. He bu
934.
by vsareto 6y ago
No, that's why I said it was political unfairness.
935.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Said differently, if I'm gonna pay you 300k per year, you'd better have the exact skills I search for. If only executive salaries with golden parachutes were as discriminating as developer negotiations.
936.
by vsareto 6y ago
>why can't they similarly disagree with software import restrictions? It's easier to verify what a borderless, open algorithm does. It's a lot harder to do that with packaged software. Has TikTok posted the source of their
937.
by vsareto 6y ago
>One is because homes today are substantially larger This is the problem, really. It's hard to find a simple single-floor home for individuals or no-kid couples.
938.
by vsareto 6y ago
This might be unpopular, but they're not going to let major things fail because of political reasons. Popular opinion thinks the US is declining, and failures only add to that perceived momentum. That's why there's endless st
939.
by vsareto 6y ago
Maybe the technical programmers just aren't in a place where their talents are valued and used effectively? Maybe you found a great place that's a good fit before they did?
940.
by vsareto 6y ago
Welp, their trucks are going to get hacked easily.
941.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Why? Why would anyone do that? What would even drive one to do that? It's addiction, it isn't rational.
942.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Maybe because they earnt their position through merit? They earned the position of representing a wildly exaggerated view of how tech companies influence their users? Give me a break, this show was just dumb. It added no value to the co
943.
by vsareto 6y ago
We don't humanize statistical methods or other math formulas in similar fashions, we (should) blame the people that wield them irresponsibly. The show, up until I stopped watching, felt like slow-rolling click bait.
944.
by vsareto 6y ago
>when the tech is indiscriminant It sometimes isn't, but why did they put 3 white dudes in charge of messing with someone's life when they know that's the prevailing stereotype of SV engineers? Could it be that they were t
945.
by vsareto 6y ago
Diversity in tech is a problem and this show was reinforcing that.
946.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Watch “The Social Dilemma” on Netflix I'm sorry, but that show was really, really dumb and unrealistic and I couldn't sit through it. 3 engineers (notably: cringey white dudes) are never following one single user and controlli
947.
by vsareto 6y ago
I don't disagree, but this kind of goal post moving is how zero cost will turn into a buzzword down the line because it'll really mean zero incremental costs when referring to operations. Plus, zero incremental costs may only appl
948.
by vsareto 6y ago
>However, if you can reduce the risk with zero cost, you should do that. Zero cost is rarely, rarely true with regards to operations. If you use non-standard ports, you'll have to document that somewhere, or else it becomes tribal k
949.
by vsareto 6y ago
>There is virtually no literature on this and I have looked hard for examples. Considering how spies are mixed in, I don't doubt it
950.
by vsareto 6y ago
Now we just need a Javascript Lo-Fi girl
951.
by vsareto 6y ago
I think it's the other way, the rapport and chemistry allow you to resist someone when they're (consciously or not) dominating the room. You're more easily divided if you don't have that with your coworkers.
952.
by vsareto 6y ago
I'd call it a good sign if you can even identify GC-related issues in production. That means all of the other problems that seem to plague .NET shops have been taken care of.
953.
by vsareto 6y ago
>Tend to stay away from anything that is "my cousins friend at work asked how to buy stocks because he wants to buy x" Oh, so basically the entire stock market during the pandemic?
954.
by vsareto 6y ago
Idk how anyone can look at Tesla and see that it's "fundamentally" flawed.
955.
by vsareto 6y ago
No one knows what the skill threshold is anyway, so it's all made up depending on who you can convince.
956.
by vsareto 6y ago
Add a comment in the file?
957.
by vsareto 6y ago
Well, code reviewers can choose to enforce best practices, so you kind of do have to write code in a certain way according to them.
958.
How to Spot Toxic Software Jobs from Their Descriptions(medium.com)
11 points by vsareto 6y ago|4 comments
959.
by vsareto 6y ago
It doesn't matter much how much work you put into maintainability, someone somewhere will find a rule to declare it unmaintainable. The rules for maintainable code are not maintainable!
960.
by vsareto 6y ago
Combining the touch detection with other devices would already be useful on its own. A phone and neuralink could work together and figure out when I'm holding it and unlock automatically and then lock it when I stop holding it. The con

More ›