vrotaru

12 ms·

61.
by vrotaru 11y ago
Just yesterday I've watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88-szpeNfrU Long story short: keep the traditional getters and setters but have just a byte[] field to store the object state. For example If you need j
62.
by vrotaru 11y ago
Well the spam-bots will learn to generate cool stories, we may actually enjoy spam.. Has anyone trained RNN on YCombinator comments ?
63.
by vrotaru 12y ago
Probably you have old ```.julia``` folder. Remove it and try again
64.
Is Docker eating Java's lunch?(blog.osgi.org)
2 points by vrotaru 12y ago|1 comments
65.
by vrotaru 12y ago
It seems that you argue for subtyping for the sake of subtyping. Up to you man. Peace.
66.
by vrotaru 12y ago
Sidestepping much? We are, obviously, not speaking about a natural language here. I think this is an example of an hierarchy without a purpose. Pointless OO, what's not to love here..
67.
by vrotaru 12y ago
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ... extends IndexOutOfBoundsException extends RuntimeException extends Exception extends Throwable Not exactly an abomination, but I would not call it thing of beauty
68.
by vrotaru 13y ago
And more mini-languages which are implemented in Ocaml, here: https://github.com/andrejbauer/plzoo
69.
by vrotaru 13y ago
Just in case you can explain it quickly. What happens if the people you know and trust let your down? (It that's a phrase) The one who is last is holding the IOU is gonna support the loss ?
70.
by vrotaru 13y ago
Actually the point Greanspun (not Greensburg) is trying is whether her brother confidence would have resulted in an A in a physics class at Caltech.
71.
by vrotaru 13y ago
This is bad??? Sandberg confirms that “A is Average” at Harvard. Her brother David, a neurosurgeon whom Sandberg admires because currently “he splits child care duties with his wife fifty-fifty”, was also a Harvard undergrad. He takes “a c
72.
by vrotaru 13y ago
As I understand it the Bitcoin is HTML and bitcoind is Netscape It does not make a lot of sense, to disagree/disaprove of HTML, and hail a Netscape alternative.
73.
by vrotaru 14y ago
> Things have real value. That's dodging the question. And in a rather clumsy way. The "use value" of things depends heavily on epoch, person, even fashion and weather. So what is exactly "real" in real value? > the present value of
74.
by vrotaru 14y ago
> That's not the inherent value. Show me your inherent-value-meter, or shut up. Simple, eh?
75.
by vrotaru 14y ago
First let me explain, what I was replaying to. The OC argument to seems to be, bitcoin and beany babes are expression of the same idea and beanie babes flopped. Ergo bitcoin will fail. Hence the question about greenbacks, which are now not
76.
by vrotaru 14y ago
Now that's fanboyism at its worst. I mean, equating A with something X when it is not clear, how even remotely similar those are, but where X conveniently failed some time ago. But to reply in kind, how are greenbacks these days?
77.
by vrotaru 14y ago
The stock market is a place the stock is traded. A bitcoin exchange is a place where the bitcoin is traded. Obviously this is neither the only actual, nor potential use of bitcoin.
78.
by vrotaru 14y ago
yes, but for one thing a) no one cares b) it is not a hard limit, actually and, maybe, a) has something to do with b)
79.
by vrotaru 14y ago
There will be only 21 million bitcoins. Ever.
80.
by vrotaru 14y ago
You're confusing money and wealth. And you saying it yourself, to quote "your wealth increases" Yes, but this is not the same as making money. You're are not richer in relative terms, than you were. It's only stuff who has get cheaper aro
81.
by vrotaru 14y ago
You do not "make" money, when you hide them under a mattress. Assuming a stable money supply, when all is said and done, you own the same fraction of total purchasing power at the end that period as you had when it started. You do not get r
82.
by vrotaru 14y ago
> Any system in which people can end up with the same portion of an economy after sitting both their labor and their capital out on the sidelines for 100 years is fundamentally broken. Assertions. Words. Some of those strong.. To be fra
83.
by vrotaru 14y ago
Well, I disagree, with the interpretation of events known as Great Depression as a deflationary spiral. Yes, there was a deflationary event. As there were many before, and the last one before in 1920-1921, when the wholesale prices fall by
84.
by vrotaru 14y ago
> If I have shillings equal to 5% of GDP, and I put myself into cryosleep for 100 years, there is no reason I should expect my uninvested shillings to still have 5% of GDP. This is a child's view of an economy. Can your elaborate? Actua
85.
by vrotaru 14y ago
What does exactly happen when an economy grows from 10 billion quatloos to 11 billion quatloos? Until you tell me that, we are measuring woomdums in quatloos and while that can be kind of fun.. it not very rewarding. If you speaking about p
86.
by vrotaru 14y ago
a) Now, that's a different assertion from the original one. (People will stop buying stuff). I'm glad we agree on this one. Ain't gonna happen. b) Are saying the well-off never squander money on stupid things? Is the last sentence some kin
87.
by vrotaru 14y ago
a) Time preference (I guess you have a phone, even if..) b) Marginal utility of every extra unit of money decreases when a person holds more of them. Couple that with falling prices and you have the killer of deflationary spiral. A nice the
88.
by vrotaru 14y ago
First you have missed the all things equal caveat, second people hoarding cash will not lead to a deflationary spiral, who give that idea? It will lead to a new equilibrium. The greater the cash balances and lower the prices the greater the
89.
by vrotaru 14y ago
Well, that's exactly my point. In a system with a fixed money supply (all things equal) the only way to have price deflation is to have greater output, greater productivity. Now tell me again, how this is awful? EDIT: As for the rent seekin
90.
by vrotaru 14y ago
Price deflation or money deflation? Price deflation is a good thing. I'm typing on something which is a "living" proof of these.

More ›