volida

47 ms·

451.
by volida 18y ago
99designs.com
452.
by volida 18y ago
use email then
453.
by volida 18y ago
from your memory??
454.
by volida 18y ago
i guess at least 5 people do care enough * 10 (if thats the percentage you expect to engage in vote) = 50 people do care so, i was wrong!
455.
by volida 18y ago
who cares
456.
by volida 18y ago
most of the significant apps are cross-social-network and their value is not based on Fb alone.
457.
by volida 18y ago
in a world that most people strive for more important stuff like their health and some food I wouldn't say fun is the reason they don't engage into creating something novel, although some go broke just for pursuing their passions.
458.
by volida 18y ago
ever heard of laser surgery?
459.
by volida 19y ago
there are always secrets nobody will share
460.
by volida 19y ago
the quality is better at omnisio
461.
by volida 19y ago
I dont understand what you mean. Already VOIP is cost effective, and already you can make cheaper phone calls from a landlines/mobile through VOIP biapassing the normal cost.
462.
by volida 19y ago
"red-black tree while blindfolded-in assembly" you are kidding right? most people won't know what that is and if they do they probably can't program one in C if they know programming in C
463.
by volida 19y ago
that seems to be on purpose because of the potential of violating copyright or until they find a good way to generate more money or until YouTube grows so big that will be an unevitable source for video (oh yes it's already that) no revenue
464.
by volida 19y ago
I had already erased my comment before you've responded. anw, maybe I am wrong but I don't think you can easily replace a marketplace that works.
465.
by volida 19y ago
it's not hard to see the difference
466.
by volida 19y ago
allow me to say Fb is not any close eBay
467.
by volida 19y ago
a lot more people can replicate a social network feature set than a search engine. That's why is harder to replace Google. the moment any networking site begins charging for any of their service they will lose 90% of users, and they know it
468.
by volida 19y ago
you can either spend that energy and reply to the person try explaining why you worth X you are requesting (assumuning they are not naive and willing to understand) or write a blog post a of type "all I need is a XYZ"
469.
by volida 19y ago
until I succeed I'd call me more a fool than bold
470.
by volida 19y ago
Not everyone when exposed to entrepreurship feels the urge to embrace it and most of all pursue it no matter cost, no matter where they live. Therefore, it's obvious that those who do, have a different drive. That's what I meant and some fo
471.
by volida 19y ago
people would notice only if the site is already known or else nobody would care, but it would probably hurt the site than do good
472.
by volida 19y ago
I think it's not true that entrepreneurs are "born". you go that one a bit wrong
473.
by volida 19y ago
if you think something is wrong with the Internet, then build a startup around the problem.
474.
by volida 19y ago
how can we have an opinion if we don't experience looking at your monitor?
475.
by volida 19y ago
by the way something I noticed, clickpass breaks the back button (the same happens in Hacker News and Disqus login page). My guess is that a hidden iframe is loaded by clickpass which is redirected, therefore requiring you to click the brow
476.
Disqus, Daniel Ha interview(loiclemeur.com)
10 points by volida 19y ago|1 comments
477.
by volida 19y ago
still you don't answer if is irreplaceable and why
478.
by volida 19y ago
"will even be 1/10th" that will depend if they succeed to monetize their success. You can't be sure so sure any predictions for anything these days.
479.
by volida 19y ago
that's an interesting perspective, but I don't think is really valid. People will easily/hardly change their default social network but really easier than switching from Google which is a point of reference to those who are used to it. Even
480.
by volida 19y ago
The serious question is if it can be replaced not if its currently popular. there are already so many social networks, so facebook is not dominant where as Google has penetrated globally due to its quality.

More ›