vokep

43 ms·

1. 451.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   In laymen terms, sure! Its a useful enough way to think about it. Technically though the fov is refering to fovea, not field of view.
2. 452.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   "Oops" At least they handled it quickly once noticed.
3. 453.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   They certainly don't lose. They are all to be patients who are going soon anyways, who opt for the process.
4. 454.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   I didn't say fully developed, I said fully capable which in context is to mean that they are capable of going out on the open net without anything they see permanently warping their worldview inaccurately. Its reasonable to shield chi
5. 455.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   If I had only access to supervised internet there is absolutely no way I'd have the job I have today. (or at least, I'd have it 10 years later) I agree with you up to the age of maybe 10-12, beyond that you're restricting a
6. 456.▲
   by vokep 9y ago

   This moves 2x1 over 6 generations, which is apparently the theoretical minimum, so it does not violate game of life's c. I'm not sure why that is true however, my naive guess is that for any movement forward, some 'reset&#x27