voidspark

20 ms·

241.
by voidspark 2y ago
A procedural chess engine does not perform generalization, in ML terms. That is an explicitly programmed algorithm. Generalization has a specific meaning in the context of machine learning. The AlphaGo Zero model learned advanced strategi
242.
by voidspark 2y ago
He is setting a bar, saying that that is the "true" generalization. Deep neural networks are definitely performing generalization at a certain level that beats humans at translation or Go, just not at his ARC bar. He may not think
243.
by voidspark 2y ago
You are shifting the goal posts from AI to AGI. That's outside of the scope of the argument. For self updating - yes it is an engineering choice. It's already engineered in some narrow cases such as AutoML
244.
by voidspark 2y ago
LOL. I tried this with Grok https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_1e6f3801-c9fb-4d33-844b-3902... "Based on the information you provided, it seems you need something capable of plimfing to handle your erork. Kwomps can’
245.
by voidspark 2y ago
AlphaGo Zero didn't just pattern match. It invented moves that it had never been shown before. That is generalization, even if it's domain specific. Humans don't apply Go skills to cooking either. Calling it machine learning
246.
by voidspark 2y ago
Chollet's argument was that it's not "true" generalization, which would be at the level of human cognition. He sets the bar so high that it becomes a No True Scotsman fallacy. The deep neural networks are practically gen
247.
by voidspark 2y ago
But that's exactly what these deep neural networks have shown, countless times. LLM's generalize on new data outside of its training set. It's called "zero shot learning" where they can solve problems that are not i
248.
by voidspark 2y ago
You are doubling down on a muddled vague non-technical intuition about these terms. Please tell us what that "baseline definition" is.
249.
by voidspark 2y ago
That's right. It's not "show the working". It's "do more working".
250.
by voidspark 2y ago
You are confusing sentience or consciousness with intelligence.
251.
by voidspark 2y ago
Yes it's a value judgement by the author. Maximizing profit by any means necessary is pathological. Many here would agree with that.
252.
by voidspark 2y ago
It is worth burning hundreds of billions, because users are demanding it and getting value from it. Grok has already overloaded their 200k GPU cluster and is struggling to keep up with the demand.