vntok

37 ms·

451.
by vntok 4y ago
So? Evidently people who properly wrap their tacos "all the time, every time", aren't the target of such an invention.
452.
by vntok 4y ago
If you're not curious enough to read past a few lines of content, you're not really the target to be honest. Pentesting (or hacking in any sense of the term) often involves spending a lot of time researching and learning about thi
453.
by vntok 4y ago
Hmm, no we should not. The default is already that any stated opinion is your own, disclosing ties is only necessary when you're expressing an opinion about a company you are actually working for. This case, when an employee speaks abo
454.
by vntok 4y ago
Consider that your experience may not be representative. You might be part of the very low percent of people whom Google Search does not target and does not want to spend money on acquiring/retaining.
455.
by vntok 4y ago
Yes, anyone writing on behalf of their employers would present opinions that may not be their own.
456.
by vntok 5y ago
Indeed. > “I go like, Oh my gosh, Elon Musk just DM’d me: ‘Can you take this down? It’s a security risk,’” Mr. Sweeney said. “Then he offered me $5,000 to take it down and help him make it slightly harder for ‘crazy people to track me.’”
457.
by vntok 5y ago
Avoiding the requirement to file quarterly earnings reports.
458.
by vntok 5y ago
> Some companies cannot operate effectively without atlassian products Kind of their problem to be frank. > so a fuckup of that scale might just have legal consequences depending on whom it hits. Any contract those companies signed wo
459.
by vntok 5y ago
Don't complain, you'll get a few months worth of free credits or something.
460.
by vntok 5y ago
Well they aren't wrong.
461.
by vntok 5y ago
How many users submitted the form vs how many users reached the form's page won't tell you anything about why they left or how long they struggled before submitting. A beacon sent for each click on links on the form's page wi
462.
by vntok 5y ago
For the vast vast majority of people (or as we call them in cases of cyber-harassment, "the mob"), it will be gone from the Internet.
463.
by vntok 5y ago
Of course they should be interviewed back, what's the alternative? Hey team, so this is Steve from another department in another company. He's been assigned to our team, so. Of course we're handling text in the Chromium engi
464.
by vntok 5y ago
The foreign entity does not forbid you to use any font at all, in any sense of the term. You are told by an assembly of elected representatives that you must treat their 450 million citizens' data with care and respect. You are perfect
465.
by vntok 5y ago
Sites are perfectly allowed to do just that... of course doing that they deprive themselves of an enormous, rich and growing market, a market that will surely be tackled by regional companies more respectful of their customers.
466.
by vntok 5y ago
In the EU, most video embeds I find now have an interstitial popup you have to click for the video to actually load.
467.
by vntok 5y ago
They are telling you.
468.
by vntok 5y ago
Hiding special files doesn't remove them. They are still there, in every directory, sitting completely useless, thereby littering the place.
469.
by vntok 5y ago
Seems way more efficient to not care about standards and invest a couple late nights once every five years.
470.
by vntok 5y ago
Yes, but that is not a great way to convince people. Surely they would move back to Chrome as soon as they realize you were lying?
471.
by vntok 5y ago
Why would your buddy have your keys or any way to help third parties empty your wallet?
472.
by vntok 5y ago
Yes. Obviously they don't want to leave this growing billion dollars market. How could anyone rational think otherwise? Why hasn't any journalist paused for a second and questioned this? The treatment of this litteral fake news re
473.
by vntok 5y ago
> No, I just don't want thousands of confusingly named, completely worthless and/or actively harmful functions to always be in scope. Again, why would you care whether some functions that you don't use are available should
474.
by vntok 5y ago
Why would you care how many global functions there are in PHP? Just namespace your own functions and the whole "issue" will instantly disappear.
475.
by vntok 5y ago
Providing a TL;DR version of an article can be valuable, but only if you hit high enough precision and recall rates. Here, your comment only talks about the article's main points, giving it a high precision rate. However, out of three
476.
by vntok 5y ago
Well diamonds are fungible for any definition of the word you may choose and for the vast majority of the stones. Some of them are unique in that they're very large, very pure, have been worked on so much they are identifiable, have an
477.
by vntok 5y ago
This very site uses 1st party ads, so we know for certain that the probability I was talking about is actually zero and not merely basically zero.
478.
by vntok 5y ago
Diamonds are scarce. Manufactured scarcity still results in actual scarcity.
479.
by vntok 5y ago
That's how diamonds and gold work. You wouldn't accept blood diamonds for example, it would reflect poorly on you.
480.
by vntok 5y ago
It cannot be true that you never saw a single ad because brave cannot block first party ads and the probability that you never ever visited a site that uses 1st party ads is basically zero.

More ›