vivid242

3 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   I disagree. It is not an attack on the developers, but the platforms‘ mechanics.
2. 32.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   You‘re absolutely right. (I‘m not an LLM ;-)) And the fact that (I‘m looking at you, LinkedIn!) platforms actively block people from using external links is a good warning sign. Connection with people- this is what I want from the internet,
3. 33.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   In nature, sometimes death is the prerequisite of life: Think of the dead leaves on the forest ground. I think the age of algorithmic curation is dead - but it may, through a „RenaiSSance“, bring back true human connection.
4. 34.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   Pinky swear!
5. 35.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   Nice! I‘d be interesting in the things that went wrong during development. Which loopholes were discovered last, if any?
6. 36.▲
   by vivid242 7mo ago

   We need new ways to prove our humanness.
7. 37.▲
   by vivid242 8mo ago

   Love the addition „no algorithm“
8. 38.▲
   by vivid242 8mo ago

   I like it! There are, of course, challenges a la https://novehiclesinthepark.com/ – the swamp of subjectivity ("This is about enforcing a political PoV" vs. "This is about enforcing respectful conversation&qu
9. 39.▲
   by vivid242 8mo ago

   Thanks for the effort! I'm always intrigued by the German FE-Schrift ("fälschungserschwerende Schrift", "more-difficult-to-forge font") chooses shapes for characters that makes it hard for them to be turned into one
10. 40.▲
    by vivid242 8mo ago

    Reminds me of the game DEFCON. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEFCON_(video_game) Especially its subtitle/message: Everybody loses.
11. 41.▲
    by vivid242 8mo ago

    It would be wrong, though.