Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
visarga
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
31.
▲
by
visarga
15d ago
Do you have one but only with AI? like, a toggle on what side to see? Edit: ah yes, sure it exists
32.
▲
by
visarga
15d ago
> we will have serfdom instead Makes no sense - why would anyone use humans as serfs when AI is there. I think everyone will have AI and probably robotic automations, they will all be cheap and accessible.
33.
▲
by
visarga
16d ago
When they get down to 10% put one in the case, by the time your other bug gets to 1% you changed the first one. No gaps
34.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
> In 1850 a lot of people were more self sufficient - the whole family was growing their own food and making their own cloth - and so saying there was even one income is false - there mostly was no income but they only bought a few thin
35.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
> Keyboards don't suggest chains of reasoning or words to type My iPhone keyboard does
36.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
Even if AI used the result, AI pushed it to the finish line while Levent and Tristan did not. But I understand the approach was different, the information leak was only that it was "doable".
37.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
You can just spin up deep research agents that ingest many sources at once to produce reports that don't replicate any one source too much. Since agents compare against sources they provide across-source analysis - what is the distribu
38.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
> When I buy I chair You should, sitting on that chair got you in the zone where you made it rich. /s
39.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
I use the /s4 skill "simple short synthetic style". Just 4 words, easy to remember the formula.
40.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
Own your robot, it will cost less than a car.
41.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
I use a file "task.md" as blackboard. It is read/written by multiple agents, usually monitor agent, worker agent, judge agent and reflexion agent. Each work item is an open gate initially, after agent solves it, it appends on
42.
▲
by
visarga
17d ago
RLVR
43.
▲
by
visarga
18d ago
I blame it on their focus on "persona design". They botched it.
44.
▲
by
visarga
18d ago
I am wondering if in 2-3 years AI will be heads and shoulders above us in both images and text. Then will we continue to see the slop accusations? Maybe its slop is better than most of our work.
45.
▲
by
visarga
18d ago
But is fairness between carbon uses justified? Or we cut the line at some point.
46.
▲
by
visarga
18d ago
If you want quick access look at google images for "transformer attention formula" there are some interesting depictions
47.
▲
by
visarga
18d ago
Author might have spend days researching it, selecting what to include and what not to, revising the language and graphics, then comes Pangram and slaps 100% AI on it without looking into the substance.
48.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
When AI gets that good, a solar panel can power a pile of motors and gears to move and do work for you that previously required humans. You won't need the job, you need to solve your necessities more directly. And that job is a good fi
49.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
Haven't you seen how ridiculously good robots have become?
50.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
And because of you we are now looking bad, so you're pressuring us with your unleashed creativity.
51.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
Maybe they still want to serve the feee tokens if that gets them good training data.
52.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
On macs you just install a desktop app. What can be simpler? Decent Qwen models already doing some simpler types of agentic work.
53.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
They can't afford to miss out or be seen as missing out. It's not rational, yet it is in a way.
54.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
Yeah, I have a room like that but I never stay in it. No screens.
55.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
Going on social media to talk about not going on social media. It's at least 50% as effective as actually not going on social media.
56.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
7.5 years ago it was perfect
57.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
>> I think the „my brain isn’t the same anymore“ sensation is pretty universal. Another pretty universal thing is that we compare to younger versions of ourselves. That might explain the gap.
58.
▲
by
visarga
19d ago
This only holds when you keep the task fixed and compare with and without AI. But because AI changed expectations the difficulty of work we supervise today is much higher. My theory is that AI runs our brains just as hard as no-AI, maybe ha
59.
▲
by
visarga
20d ago
I've been RSI'ing for 6 months.
60.
▲
by
visarga
20d ago
> That company is morally bankrupt When they fired Sam 700 out of 770 OAI employees threatened to move to Microsoft together. So they were giving their work on AGI to MS just like that.
More ›