viro

20 ms·

181.
by viro 5y ago
by making it a crime to have one or accept money from one? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯....
182.
by viro 5y ago
.... yea im sure it has nothing to do with the massive deadly riots that tore apart parts the country ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
183.
by viro 5y ago
war crimes are war crimes, abuse is abuse. Being a past victim doesn't make ur actions any less evil.
184.
by viro 5y ago
Well first risk analysis doesn't work like that. Second leaving ur kids unsupervised in a car is illegal in most states here. Hell in most states it's legal for me to break your car window if you do that to a freaking dog. so yea
185.
by viro 5y ago
no?
186.
by viro 5y ago
Because it's a crime to intently destroy other peoples property?
187.
by viro 5y ago
Do you have the money still?
188.
by viro 5y ago
if its boost moblie I can't say im very surprised. basically tracfone level trash
189.
by viro 5y ago
> the government unlawfully collected their data etc. How did the ANT catalog leaks do that? Did you not notice Russia suddenly got more aggressive (annexing Crimea etc.) after the Snowden incedent?
190.
by viro 5y ago
The GOP argument is kind of highlighted here. Your city didn't have to spend any of its own money. while a business would have had to spend millions to build then to maintain. A business must have ROI and profit to survive(due to infl
191.
by viro 5y ago
But it does for the intelligence community.
192.
by viro 5y ago
If you can sign up without a call you should be able to cancel without a call. Its the #1 reason Im pro-apple enforcing its IAP stuff.
193.
by viro 5y ago
dark patterns that require you to call the company should be illegal... like criminally illegal. Edit: how is this a controversial take
194.
by viro 5y ago
Most of the internet is technically non nonessential.
195.
by viro 5y ago
Spotify and YouTube
196.
by viro 5y ago
the inability to gain access to anywhere near the same level of content they did before. Is a quick and simple one.
197.
by viro 5y ago
you know what makes it true? common sense. You're detached from reality if you don't think this will now have a massive negative effects on poor people.
198.
by viro 5y ago
Thats a rather fancy way to say. poor people can't afford to pay a sub for every ad supported site they use.
199.
by viro 5y ago
> was to steal the private information of a sizable part of the world population and sell it to advertisers, Thats not how ad targeting works.
200.
by viro 5y ago
Did you use the internet before 2006? There was ads... a lot of them honestly more annoying too.
201.
by viro 5y ago
So we should just kick poor people off the internet?
202.
by viro 5y ago
it would also kick poor people off the internet
203.
by viro 5y ago
you don't seem to understand... This would have the exact opposite result.. I would pay for a Twitter and YouTube sub and every other website could fuck all the way off. I'm not paying separately for 40 other random sites.
204.
by viro 5y ago
YEA! lets force every ad supported company to force people too pay for content! Nothing bad will happen from that ...
205.
by viro 5y ago
Its not theft its you paying for the service of the website. What la la land do you live in.
206.
by viro 5y ago
Then who pays for 99% of the websites on the internet? hosting isn't free.
207.
by viro 5y ago
> unsolicited advertising Advertising doesn't show up on site without the OWNER of the site wanting it to be there.
208.
by viro 5y ago
> Capitalism has all the murders and atrocities you can think of. It’s just not attributable to a single entity, but hidden behind ideas like „not profitable“ Do truly not see the difference between the government making the active choic
209.
by viro 5y ago
Tell that to the companies fined for using mail chimp. You might to look up the regulatory requirements to "follow the law". when it comes to EU companies using services from US based companies. Even if the data never leaves the E
210.
by viro 5y ago
bruh ... who wouldn't be a lil suicidal when they find out they are going to jail for the rest of their life.

More ›