vineyardmike

942 ms·

1. 3541.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   The linked documents are Goldman Sachs documents. So they're coming from GS, at least directly.
2. 3542.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   Adding to what others said, too little insulin can be dangerous, so if users don't know/notice that it stopped delivering more insulin, they might not manually add the requisite amounts. Forgetting to take medication is dangerous,
3. 3543.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   So this is just a play to avoid the Credit Card processing fees right?
4. 3544.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   So I broadly agree with your point (that 'backdoors are bad'), but I'm both curious, and want to play devil's advocate. > its been proven over and over that if there is a way it will be abused. Is there actually any g
5. 3545.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   Apple has already spent significant engineering effort to develop internal ARM chips, so RISCV doesn't seem on the horizon. That said, at least one apple researcher has probably looked at RISC-V at some point, given their size and bu
6. 3546.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   The threat comes from closed-source devices. If these closed-source devices send un-encrypted data, you can MiTM these devices when they're on your network. But if they're encrypted, you're SOL.
7. 3547.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   Don't forget that future violations hold Zuck et al. personally liable for violations. Potentially criminally liable. > Any false certification will subject them to individual civil and criminal penalties.
8. 3548.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   The problem with this is that "Chicken Little" is probably not an adventurous person, but rather a poor person. This makes privacy another privilege that can be bought. This devolves into another way to exploit poorer people.
9. 3549.▲
   by vineyardmike 7y ago

   I don't think it matters if the technology they use is revolutionary - what's revolutionary when they were made was the actual use of technology. They are a just very visible example of how using technology could be a business mod
10. 3550.▲
    by vineyardmike 7y ago

    I would consider them Tech companies (now, in 2019), although I see your point. They operate in non-tech industries, but their product is a technological one. Uber is not a taxi company, they are a taxi-calling company (as they would want t
11. 3551.▲
    by vineyardmike 8y ago

    Pretty sure all of MA banned cashless stores in the 70's. Guess this is the first _city_, but still not the "first" to make the move.