vimslayer

9 ms·

91.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Isn't qt webkit what the infamous pgAdmin 4 used to use? shivers
92.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Most compilers that target WebAssembly can also target asm.js, which is compatible with IE. AFAIK it's more about missing stuff like DOM access and GC that stands in the way.
93.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Indeed, JS does not have classical inheritance. IMO introducing a class syntax that looks so much like the classes from other languages and yet behaves differently was a mistake. The rest of your comment sounds a bit misinformed to me. You
94.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Yep, works well now.
95.
by vimslayer 8y ago
The page load speed is seriously impressive, congrats! There's something weird going on with the styling of the dropdowns, though: https://i.imgur.com/WQ3m52X.gif I'm on Windows 10 & Chrome
96.
by vimslayer 8y ago
It looks even worse on mobile https://i.imgur.com/EOm3D4Y.png I also don't think the JS is that bad here, the site loaded pretty fast for me even when I tested with a slow 3G network. But yeah that UI doesn't give
97.
by vimslayer 8y ago
But IDB follows the same-origin policy, so you can't share the cached runtime between different apps. At least not unless you can load it from the same public CDN. Edit: Actully, I'm not sure you could do that even with the public
98.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Definitely not, but the original commenter was looking for any purely functional programming language, not necessarily one with dependent types. I think we are years away from having an easily comprehensible and usable dependent type system
99.
by vimslayer 8y ago
Obviously, not all railways are like Promises (they don't need to be async) but Promises are kind of railways, as the parent commenter said. Not sure what you mean by "recursively build up and tear down" but this JS snippet s