villish

5 ms·

31.
by villish 1mo ago
Should everyone have access to guns too? I ask because there seems to be a disconnect where a lot of people who live in countries with gun control don’t want AI offensive capabilities to be regulated. I presume your country doesn’t have AI
32.
by villish 1mo ago
Keep in mind these downloadable models use 3-10x the amount of tokens as well. You really can’t beat a couple $20 subscriptions. https://quesma.com/benchmarks/babaisbench/
33.
by villish 1mo ago
If you have been using cloud hosted models, you will be severely disappointed with what you’d be able to run on 16GB VRAM. You will spend most of your time fighting with the model to fix its mistakes.
34.
by villish 1mo ago
Why would they not apply to all models? The models with downloadable weights aren’t “open”. Meaning no one can actually give a summary about their training content and security. Which is what they’re asking US labs.
35.
by villish 1mo ago
The article only lists US labs, I wonder if that was an oversight. Chinese models are also available to Europeans through API providers. Surely they risk fines too.. right?
36.
by villish 2mo ago
Countries that aren’t competitive need access to training datasets so that they may train their own similarly capable models and be sure of the inputs. Governments cannot blindly trust open weight models from China and the US.
37.
by villish 2mo ago
What quant are you running and tps?
38.
by villish 2mo ago
> but agree on not "bullying" allies for no reason and little profit. This is what confuses me most about Trumps tactics. These are longtime friends and allies who would’ve gladly worked together to try to improve any perceived
39.
by villish 2mo ago
Thats only important if running it locally is critical for privacy reasons or just as a hobby. Time has a cost in business. If a model needs 30 million tokens to achieve a similar result as another that can do it in 10 million, that 60 toke
40.
by villish 2mo ago
Evangelical Christians are the target audience. They are strong supporters of Israel because of their interpretation of the bible.
41.
by villish 2mo ago
> Part of European dining is the social aspect So like every culture in the world then?
42.
by villish 2mo ago
Both propriety and open weight models are closed source. Open source would include training data so anyone could train a similarly capable model.
43.
by villish 2mo ago
The NSA’s fast16 driver silently modified nuclear simulation data on computers in Iran. This type of attack is possible with open weight models. For instance give slightly inaccurate gps coordinates within China if model might be used in a
44.
by villish 2mo ago
Such as? There are alternatives to almost anything you can think of already. All popular sites and services have clones. What more do you want? The issue I think you’ll run into is that they’re lacking users and kind of just worse versions.
45.
by villish 2mo ago
Did you forget about what happened with Hong Kong?
46.
by villish 2mo ago
I have no doubt companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google will rush to give them all the data they want in order to keep those government contracts flowing.
47.
by villish 2mo ago
Muse 1.1 performed relatively well according to benchmarks, putting it within spitting distance of the premier models. However, based on the results I got from it and the review videos I watched, it wasn’t even close. Opus 5 is incredible a
48.
by villish 2mo ago
> trust from the open source community volunteers in the open source community use whatever is easiest and cheap. open weights is not open source. there is no "trust".
49.
by villish 3mo ago
The comment I replied to was comparing numbers released by each lab, and they made a typo with that specific benchmark.
50.
by villish 3mo ago
> Terminal Bench: Flash 82.7 vs Terra 78.4 Terra 87.4 https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/
51.
by villish 3mo ago
They are slaps on the wrists AND shake downs. The fines aren't to 'correct' bad behavior. Look at the EU delivery apps being found to participate in a cartel. They received a large fine but still allowed to keep what they gai
52.
by villish 3mo ago
Wow. So this is what a codebase looks like if you just had "come up with 3 improvements" running in a loop. TempleOS was more sane than whatever this is.
53.
by villish 3mo ago
OpenAI's Zero Data Retention claim held up in court. They were unable to produce prompts and outputs because they were never retained. I believe that is only available through Enterprise API for both Anthropic and OpenAI.
54.
by villish 3mo ago
Yes. I've since watched a couple review videos on YouTube and all the game tests I've seen Opus 5 produce are incredible even compared to Fable.
55.
by villish 3mo ago
It's definitely not benchmaxxing from my experience with it. I have a test I use on all the models to create a game and Opus 5 feels like a generational leap compared to the rest. Benchmarks don't paint an accurate picture, you ha
56.
by villish 3mo ago
The open models will also be used to kill people, unfortunately.
57.
by villish 3mo ago
Your ip, browser fingerprint, if using Windows the unique id attached to your pc, and more would be used to identify you across the internet. You're anonymous to me. That doesn't mean you're anonymous to motivated government
58.
by villish 3mo ago
> Training runs are not deterministic. I agree which is why I said you could make a similarly capable model. > Open source is about being able to work with the code, not recreate it. You can also use a hex editor to modify compiled bi
59.
by villish 3mo ago
Random people? No. Governments and big corporations? Yes. It removes any concern of "backdoors", and is currently the best starting point for your own model which will be as capable as k3.
60.
by villish 3mo ago
I'm not sure why you're so dismissive about this model. It isn't currently open, but it will be. It was slow when I used it so i'll give you that. There will be other providers with better performance. My only gripe was

More ›