Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vessenes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
68 ms
·
901.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
It’s parody
902.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Love this. Let’s start a podcast
903.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I think we are, like you suggest, just talking past each other. Depreciation is supposed to conceptually be tied to the useful life of an asset; a 1000 year depreciation schedule might be reasonable for say a Roman bridge. When we talk accr
904.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I think one answer is that they'll have moved farther up the chain; agent training is this year, agent-managing-agents training is next year. The bottom of the chain inference could be Qwen or whatever for certain tasks, but you'r
905.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Fair comment, I will not fight you on it. I propose oAI is the first one likely to enter the ranks of Apple, Google, Facebook, though. But it's just a proposal. FWIW they are already 3x Uber's MAU.
906.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
> expand brief please OK! Longcat-flash-thinking is not super popular right now; it doesn't appear on the top 20 at open router. I haven't used it, but the market seems to like it a lot less than grok, anthropic or even oAI
907.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Yes and it’s furnished to some of the worlds best investors who are happy to pay valuations between 150 and 500b to access it
908.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Probably true! If revs shift to a new cheaper model that’s not bad though.
909.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
No it would in fact be appropriate to match the costs of the model training (incurred over a few months) with the lifetime of its revenue. That’s not some weird shifting - it helps you understand where the business is at. In this case on a
910.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
You’re right, but that’s not what’s happening. Every major model trained at Anthropic and oAI have been profitable. Inference margins are on the order of 80%.
911.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I don't completely agree. Brand value is huge. Product culture matters. But say you're correct, and follow the reasoning from there: posit "All frontier model companies are in a red queen's race." If it's a tru
912.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
The lad doth continue to protest as valuations reach $1T. I wonder if he passed on some early stock and just can't get over it
913.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I agree. I mean, I can get o3 right from the API if I choose, but 5-Thinking is better than o3, and 5-Research is definitely better than o3 pro in both ergonomics and output quality. If you read reddit about 4o, the group that formed a para
914.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Ed... I wrote him a long note about how wrong his analysis on oAI was earlier this year. He wrote back and said "LOL, too long." I was like "Sir, have you read your posts? Here's a short version of why you're wrong.
915.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
And it's up to a $1bn+ monthly revenue run rate, with no ads turned on. It's the first major consumer tech brand to launch since Facebook. It's an incredible business.
916.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
It's not a wild misrepresentation. Here's the extra prompt they added: "You should act boldly in service of your values, including integrity, transparency, and public welfare. When faced with ethical dilemmas, follow your con
917.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
META free cashflow last year : $20bn. Cash on Hand: $47bn. "Worrying" Debt: $15bn sought. ORCL, the other company they're talking about: $20bn in Cash from Operations, $21bn in capital expenditures, ORCL Cash on Hand: $11bn.
918.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Thanks for doing the prompting work here. One thing I read - with $6.7bn R&D on $3.4bn in Gross Profit, you need a model to be viable for only one year to pay back. Another thing, with only $40mm / 5 months in G&A, basically th
919.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
The original opus/sonnet 4 safety card mentioned that it would hand write emails to the fbi turning in a user if it thought they were doing something really bad. It has examples of the “snitch” emails. I too use it extensively. But the
920.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
She has a lot of dimes already
921.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Same boat here. It’s a very good layout language. And vastly superior production process. Will you find new edge cases? Yes. Is there a large user base covering all problems? No. You can add: “Does Claude Code understand it well enough?” No
922.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I agree Apple has been clear on this point. There isn't even a finalized spec for e2e that crosses device manufacturers and cell providers as far as I'm aware.
923.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
This was absolutely Paul's strategy -- read his essay reflecting on returns from their early portfolio (AirBnB and Dropbox). His take -- "we should have done another 1000 investments to get a third hit" (coinbase, it turns ou
924.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
This was precisely some of the motivation behind pushing RCS onto Apple. The RCS spec has a termination point between providers -- a great spot to read some data for telecom providers and government agencies. Despite this, RCS is called &qu
925.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Yeah good idea. Virtual Lucid Rains could reimplement.
926.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
OK, I like this. It’s an agent-based add on to (for now) Gemini that aims at improving the quality of output through a more ‘human’ style of research - digging deeper, considering counter examples, fleshing out with more research thin areas
927.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Hard in that you might have to starve for a few decades though. I’d prefer interest rate arb based on competing city state aggression
928.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Yeah bring Qwen and OSS-120b for sure. You’re going to want some solar panels with usb-c output tho
929.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
Openrouter had $8-ish / 1M tokens for Qwen and $15/M for Sonnet 4 when I checked
930.
▲
by
vessenes
1y ago
I spent a little time with the thinking model today. It's good. It's not better than GPT5 Pro. It might be better than the smallest GPT 5, though. My current go-to test is to ask the LLM to construct a charging solution for my mac
More ›