vertbhrtn

10 ms·

61.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
I'd argue it's unfixable for low income workers. Excessive sugar in all the cheap food is a trap they can't avoid. They don't have money to buy better food and don't have time to shop and cook for themselves. That&#
62.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
My understanding of QM is very naive, but Schrodinger equation seems really simple to me. I could probably even explain it to a 5 year old. I'd show a few pictures of standing waves on a drum surface: the first two energy levels create
63.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
Is the accurate model that complex, though? An electron is a standing wave: one could show the first two standing waves on a drum and say these are the lowest two electron energy levels. Higher levels create more sophisticated waves, and no
64.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
I've seen a clever way to derive QM out of GR equations by making a single assumption: ds2 exp(C exp(-iwt)) = c2*dt2 - dx2 - dy2 - dz2. This extra exp() factor modulates the ds2 slightly, and when mixed with GR equations, it makes the
65.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
What if something else chosen as an initial condition, like a sphere or some random shape? Would it converge to something meaningful if we apply the time-dependent SE with a meaningful field potential?
66.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
Would it really just jump into another shape? I don't understand QM much, but the Schrodinger equation looks like a typical heat equation (with some complex-number trickery) and thus in general should evolve smoothly. There should be a
67.
by vertbhrtn 6y ago
Is there a way to make these shapes evolve with time?