verroq

62 ms·

1. 571.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   You also need to account for technical ability. There's way more technical male users who know how not only to harass, but to get away with it. On sites like Facebook where it's tied to a real life identity, I'd expect to see
2. 572.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   I feel this test needs more controls. Kongregate most caters to the flash gaming, 12 year old male audience. To draw anything about online "culture" is hardly representative.
3. 573.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   I find it highly ironic that he's giving a talk there, when China's blocking his site.
4. 574.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   Exactly, by giving women special privileges, it makes it more optimal to just not hire them. However, it won't equalise until you have completely broken traditional gender roles. Until it's completely socially acceptable for men t
5. 575.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   Could they have made the video any more pretentious?
6. 576.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   Unless of course, it doesn't further their agenda or about corruption in the journalism. That's asking for radio silence.
7. 577.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   Rich privilege should also really be a thing, people like Bill Gates never used his privilege to make the world a better place.
8. 578.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   Hoarding these advantages may make life better for everyone.
9. 579.▲
   by verroq 12y ago

   >white men are in a position of privilege It's a statement that undermines everything the person have ever achieved. You only got here not because of hard work, but because of your `white privilege`. It implies a person's succe
10. 580.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    Suppose I belong to an advantaged group, what good does it do to me if I admit the advantage exists? Why would I ever want to give up this advantage? Income inequality didn't prevent a rising standard of living for everyone, what makes
11. 581.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    How is it his fault and why should he care? He didn't choose to be born as a white man. He has no more responsibility for his race than any national for their country.
12. 582.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    By trivialising issues faced by males, can you still claim what you are advocating is equality? edit: downvotes are really good arguments :^)
13. 583.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    The KKK are not being discriminatory without realising it. How do we stop discrimination? By being discriminatory.
14. 584.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    He's claiming white domination generally resulted in a better standard living. Like how income equality doesn't necessary mean everyone is worse off. Even if the rich get a bigger slice of the pie, the pie may get bigger, thus sta
15. 585.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    >top healthcare systems in the world Americans actually believe this.
16. 586.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    /sarcasm Was going to ask a serious question, then changed my mind.
17. 587.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    The downvotes are for your man-splaining. Your status as privileged group invalidates everything you say.
18. 588.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    >They're creating noise not signal Signal to people who care. "They shouldn't be posting X because I don't like X" sounds extremely entitled to me. "They are damaging the brand value of the site" which
19. 589.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    I'd argue it's orthogonal. >And of course, junk traffic breeds more junk traffic. Even if the first generation of a shady subreddit might make this up with quality in other parts of your site, it will invariably attract generat
20. 590.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    And who is to say these users are inherently low quality? Enjoying any anything socially unacceptable doesn't preclude them from creating content you may enjoy in another subreddit.
21. 591.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    What if I told you I'm a fascist dictatorship and I and I alone uphold the moral authority? Maybe we should find these people and exterminate them, for the good of everyone.
22. 592.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    >willingly allows to exist subreddits devoted towards domestic abuse and snuff Serious question: why does this even bother you?
23. 593.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    I meant the goal of getting rich, whether it happens or not.
24. 594.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    >community cheers every time there's a new bank, or centralised exchange, or processing network, etc More exposure = more publicity = more people buying in. If there is one thing about the community is consistent about, it's ab
25. 595.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    I'm quite happy to trash Bitcoin because it's userbase is intolerable, the sooner it goes to zero the better. Their idiocy have caused genuine harm to people who are new to asset trading/speculation: people who bet on Bitcoin
26. 596.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    I won't be surprised, self-censorship is rampant in the mainland community.
27. 597.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    I'm going to be pretty cynical there. China's shown it is willing use force (and bigger army diplomacy) if necessary. Spreading the word about this in China's even more difficult (internet censors). Unless the CCP buckles I c
28. 598.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    You don't think he got paid to post here? /s But seriously they didn't do the test properly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ3Ds6uf0Yg
29. 599.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    Approximate 0% of production systems have netcat. Just pick your favourite one liner from http://pentestmonkey.net/cheat-sheet/shells/reverse-shell-ch... .
30. 600.▲
    by verroq 12y ago

    >is it a zero day? The most obvious answer is no.