vedranm

9 ms·

61.
by vedranm 3y ago
How exactly would Red Hat pursue such strategy and compete with Canonical? Consider the fact that Red Hat leaves the copyright to the contributor in Red Hat's projects, while Canonical requires contributors to sign CLA to get patches i
62.
Should you do a PhD? A personal story from a current principal investigator(gaseri.org)
1 points by vedranm 3y ago|0 comments
63.
by vedranm 3y ago
Assuming this is feasible, how would you make sure the collected money ends up funding the right projects?
64.
by vedranm 3y ago
That's called source available.
65.
Typst (LaTeX alternative) 0.5.0: better internationalization and footnotes(github.com)
2 points by vedranm 3y ago|0 comments
66.
by vedranm 4y ago
Can you provide a source for that? I have found the performance between FreeBSD and Linux to be comparable, even when using Python.
67.
by vedranm 4y ago
I self-host e-mail. It's not always easy, but it's doable. It got easier over time with tools like docker-mailserver [1] and Mail-in-a-Box [2]. [1] https://github.com/docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver [2]
68.
by vedranm 4y ago
Hetzner's performance is arguably better (Epyc 2nd gen on Hetzner vs Epyc 1st gen on Scaleway), but their support for IPv6 is certainly much better: Scaleway doesn't offer PTR record and changes the IPv6 assigned to you when they
69.
by vedranm 4y ago
How about https://github.com/landrok/activitypub ? It's not two files, but it's PHP at least.
70.
by vedranm 4y ago
If you want a more lightweight server-side software that can access Fediverse, I found two good candidates (I am looking for other suggestions): - GoToSocial: https://docs.gotosocial.org/ - Pleroma: https://plero
71.
by vedranm 4y ago
You are welcome. I have no connection to its development aside from some minor translation updates and bug reports, but I can only recommend it. What I like is how easy it is to host MkDocs on GitHub Pages via built-in support, but you can
72.
by vedranm 4y ago
I work in an academic setting and I can second the sentiment. For a while, we used reStructuredText for writing the teaching materials. Every so often I would have the students that would get inspired to contribute something to the teaching
73.
Jekyll-like experience with MkDocs on GitHub Pages using Actions workflow(gaseri.org)
3 points by vedranm 4y ago|0 comments
74.
by vedranm 4y ago
FWIW, H2O has offered the same for some time: https://h2o.examp1e.net/configure/mruby_directives.html
75.
MkDocs 1.4.0 introduces Git-like hooks(mkdocs.org)
2 points by vedranm 4y ago|0 comments
76.
Basic auth will be disabled from October 1st in Outlook 365(techcommunity.microsoft.com)
6 points by vedranm 4y ago|1 comments
77.
by vedranm 4y ago
Opinions differ. I personally like it, but I don't think I would manage do it in a reasonable large codebase. Still, I agree with the points brought up in the Reddit discussion on the topic ( https://www.reddit.com/r&#x2
78.
by vedranm 4y ago
Since TeX and LLVM were already mentioned, I will casually mention the comments in Laravel's codebase which are all three lines long with each line exactly three characters shorter than the previous line. The art of computer programmin
79.
by vedranm 4y ago
There have been efforts in that direction: - https://github.com/gekmihesg/ansible-openwrt - https://github.com/NN708/ansible-openwrt and even - https://docs.ansible.com/ansible&#x2
80.
by vedranm 4y ago
> Having it in the core language, means that more libraries can depend on it, and users are therefore incentives to learn more about it, as they can rely on it sticking around. Symfony 6.1 and the upcoming Laravel 10 require PHP 8.1+, bu
81.
by vedranm 4y ago
Coroutines have been available via many packages for a while; (Open)Swoole and Amp come to mind, but there are probably others. Laravel has supported using (Open)Swoole via Octane for over a year. Why would having coroutines as fibers in th
82.
PHP 8.2.0 RC1 available for testing(php.net)
85 points by vedranm 4y ago|33 comments
83.
by vedranm 4y ago
I believe that the argument goes that processing e-mail in spam filters can take some time, so they accept it and queue it for analysis.
84.
by vedranm 4y ago
Exactly, this is not "randomly losing correspondence". This is simply spam filtering that is done after accepting the e-mail for delivery. Whether that should be an acceptable behavior or not is another discussion.
85.
by vedranm 4y ago
> It seems likely that people have lost publications and talks as a result: the emails being rejected and spam-filtered are important emails. There are likely some silently discarded e-mails as well, but you can't know for sure beca
86.
by vedranm 4y ago
Are you sure that the infrastructure behind Outlook and Office 365's Outlook is sufficiently different? I was under the impression that it's similar if not the same. Compare Outlook: $ dig mx outlook.com ;; ANSWER SECTION:
87.
by vedranm 4y ago
Why exactly? Would Microsoft's internal spam filter likely consider that spammers often don't provide that page so you would stand out?
88.
by vedranm 4y ago
> This is fairly normal in today’s world of email providers, and one of the reasons it can be painful to manage your own SMTP server, right? Yes. Silently discarded e-mail is the worst thing that can happen because you can't detecte
89.
Outlook.com is silently discarding email messages (2015)(blog.paranoidpenguin.net)
155 points by vedranm 4y ago|69 comments
90.
Two years from PHP “dying”: There are other tools(darkghosthunter.medium.com)
3 points by vedranm 4y ago|0 comments

More ›