Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vba616
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
331.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
I haven't watched TV in a few years, but when I did, I used a digital broadcast converter box and an antenna to watch OTA channels on (I think) a 720p "HD" LCD.
332.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
"Consider, for example, the “simple” concept on top of." This is from fifty years ago: Person: Pick up a big red block. Computer: OK. Person: Grasp the pyramid. Computer: I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHICH PYRAMID YOU MEAN.
333.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
Well, humans don't know how to determine if a proposition is correct. So it's no surprise we didn't teach AIs yet! Edit: I don't understand why experts say it failed when they "asked it to reason". It doesn&#
334.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
Ok, that's straightforward, I just don't care for the idea that AI can do it or even help. You might synthesize new knowledge. When ChatGPT produces new output, it's not synthesizing new knowledge. It can't even output
335.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
I meant - how do you know or why did you say ChatGPT taught you? It doesn't know what works.
336.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>That GPT-3 is just vomiting stuff up out of its training set and not producing any new knowledge? Hmm. Seems obvious to me that it's producing new output, but that output isn't knowledge and it can't be. Sometimes ChatG
337.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>No one is training LLMs to generate “misinformation”. That is phrased like it is stating a fact about the training process, but it is a statement about the intent of the training, isn't it? So I don't see it as rebutting my
338.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
Can you unpack "synthetic knowledge", cause I don't know what that really means.
339.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
How do you know?
340.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
> GPT-3 certainly isn't 100% accurate, but neither is it so perfectly unreliable that no one could ever get it to produce a relevant fact not in the prompt. I think I understand the sense in which you claim it produces relevant fac
341.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>LLMs and cryptocurrency are two completely different technologies As mind viruses operating on human brains, they do not seem completely different technologies.
342.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
That's not a real prompt. A real prompt would look more like this: At the top left of a 4k picture, place a dot with the RGB value of (0.5, 0.8, 0.2), where color components are expressed on a scale of 0-1 inclusive. Then,
343.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
A LLM is a generator of misinformation that is maximally difficult to distinguish from real information. How do you use this as a lawyer? I mean, as a stereotypical evil lawyer in a world of naïve people who don't learn from experience
344.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>You've got a huge blind spot if you think prompt engineer isn't already a thing. It may be a "thing", because generating BS is a viable business model and ChatGPT makes it more efficient. ..but I submit as a working
345.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
I really think the hardware of today must have more than enough raw power. Haven't I read about how much slower nerve cells are to signal than electronics? Maybe we are developing supersonic aircraft in a "race" for a devic
346.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
Crypto whales.
347.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
Looks like USB support for syncing was introduced in 2003, and for charging in 2004. Mine was a 4th generation monochrome - in other words, 2004ish. Had to have been USB. I don't think there were any Firewire Macs before 1999, and I do
348.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>The first iPod was a Mac-only Firewire device I don't remember ever using Firewire for anything. Are you saying it was only Firewire? Quite possible if I dug enough, I could find my iPod. It wasn't one of the very first ones
349.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
It was called Planet X. And if you wanted to continue calling it that, your position on Pluto could still be flexible, because you could say "X" means unknown, not 10.
350.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
A significant part of the "incomprehensible mess" seems to be that errors from the kernel have no context. If you ask in a forum, people just kind of shrug. It's not clear on which side the bug really is in such a situation.
351.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Variety "...a last ironic thought drifted through Hendricks’ mind...They were already beginning to design weapons to use against each other."
352.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>there are so many people here who don't understand the core issue here. Sufficiently advanced AI is indistinguishable from people who don't understand the core issue here. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it
353.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
People remember the Time Cube because it was original.
354.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>A roux can be prepared on the stovetop or in the oven The oven? Three hours?
355.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
FreeCAD, for me, has been extremely frustrating, but it has convinced me, coming from OpenSCAD and not a regular CAD background, that a constraint solver and features like fillets or the curves workbench are really things I was missing and
356.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
The way it's difficult to reorder things in a valid way is at a higher level than what I meant. What I mean is when you start getting errors that say things are invalid and every time you try to correct it flips to another window/
357.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
It's a database of practically everything ever said on the internet, no? I am coming to the conclusion that maybe for most people, simply getting a glimpse at a large database is a mind-blowing view of the abyss. Google deliberately
358.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
You go to bing.com and there's a button for a waitlist. I initially assumed it had been released to the public, but I don't consider it to be released yet. I have no idea what distortions are in the articles about it, but having t
359.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>a general solution is impossible without FreeCAD reading your mind. The goal of a well-written program is to give the user the opportunity to express what is in their mind at an appropriate time, and to change their mind after seein
360.
▲
by
vba616
4y ago
>no realistic future prospects Why? I've gotten far enough with FreeCAD despite its annoyances that I would be tempted to look into solving the problems with the kernel, and here you are discouraging people like me from getting invo
More ›