Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vasco
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
421.
▲
by
vasco
6mo ago
I know you have a whole narrative going but there's gotta be millions of "make my picture look analog" filters, that was the whole premise of Instagram, you can get specific effects for pictures to look like all kinds of spec
422.
▲
by
vasco
6mo ago
But that difference atm is the difference between it being OK on its own with a team of subagents given good enough feedback / review mechanisms or having to babysit it prompt by prompt. By the time gemma6 allows you to do the above th
423.
▲
by
vasco
6mo ago
The thing is it doesn't protect anything. All it does is funnel money to VPN providers
424.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
HN means HackerNews btw, for those 15 year accounts that don't know the jargon
425.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Nobody is going to make money from static site generators. How can a kickstarter still raise money for something claude will give them in 2 hours I have no clue. Not all software engineering is dead, but this is dead for sure. Though I also
426.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
I'm only at Four Alpha Brown Belt still but once I pass my test I think I'll also understand why this is critical. I can't wait to get scared.
427.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Maybe google "Terminal Investment"
428.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
What is overhyped about: "A new trick brings stability to quantum operations". Are people complaining about the HN title as if it's the article's title?
429.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
More agronomic means shittier, eh? I guess you meant ergonomic but funny typo
430.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
If you have a point to make, make it.
431.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
You struggle to see how a society which has a system where you put requests from other people ahead of your own healthcare is not equal to one where you take care of yourself? Did you see the examples that those women started actually getti
432.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
It's not like the approach they took is any different. Just slapped 8x the number of computers on it for calculating the same thing and wait to see if they disagree. Not the pinnacle of engineering. The equivalent of throwing money at
433.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Well of course in 700 pages you'll be about way more than any super short story as this one. But it's there for me quite vividly. Of course LLMs give an amalgamation of many things, but it's like when you look at AI generated
434.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
> It's disheartening to hear people talk about this in terms of won and lost. Is that how you think of these events? I think of them in terms of sadness and horror Its because you're such a better person than them, wow, incredi
435.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
It's very good but it's also recycled Ayn Rand, the Fountainhead.
436.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Time doesn't mean much, what is important is what they did in this 24h. If all they did was talk about it then it could be 1000 years and it wouldn't matter. What are the safety checks in place? Do they have a honey pot infrastruc
437.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
The information is more important than the wants of the writer, always.
438.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Again, that is a problem of approach, not of compute. Compute just makes that faster, it doesn't make it possible. It's like you saying the only way to do something is with threads. It's good for some use cases, bad for other
439.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
> I simply don’t see how a non-expert can look at what the experts are saying, and decide “I know better, there is in fact < 1% chance.” Remember that you are betting with your users’ lives. Problem is the experts don't tell the
440.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
> and it realizes it wants to test 2 things in isolation, forking is the only way Why would forking be the only way, when humans don't work like that? You can easily try one thing, undo, try the second thing. Your way is a faster wa
441.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Maybe the fact that US soldiers and military bases exist inside Germany's borders is slightly more important than where the gold is. First regain your sovereignty, I'd say.
442.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Yes but you cannot make up more than about 10-15 examples everyone will agree with, seeing as those are subsidized in practically every country on earth, and then apply the thinking the guy above you gives for everything else. In my opinion
443.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Those extreme takes are taken mostly for clicks or are exaggerated second hand so the "other side's" opinion is dumber than it is to "slam the naysayers". Most people are meh about everything, not on the extremes, s
444.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Someone said "its fine nobody uses this" and someone else gave the world's biggest slam dunk of "Ubuntu in 1 month" and your reply is that "not everyone does it". How far from the point can you be! In the
445.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
> We're working hard to harden the codebase with folks from Nvidia, ByteDance, Tencent and OpenAI. But coding is solved? Why do you need those guys if all they do is use claude code? Just have it solve it overnight. You forgot to pr
446.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
It's auditing, nobody that is good at doing anything goes to auditing, unfortunately its one of those jobs. I haven't interacted with any auditor that actually understood all they were auditing, some are better than others but the
447.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
> the light is coming from all the light sources in the universe, That's highly incorrect. I have many lightsources that aren't contributing to any photons in that picture. For example my refrigerator light.
448.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
Every morning it summarizes a bunch of stuff for me, suggests me PRs to review, emails to reply to, freshly cloned any new repos, pulled all others, presents me with the suggested approaches to my PRs of that day, and gives me a list of my
449.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
How can you reconcile the rest of your comment with: > That had short to mid-term positive impacts and long-term catastrophic ones, as is the typical strategy in modern times. Is the catastrophe still coming from the 70s to now? 50 years
450.
▲
by
vasco
7mo ago
There's no way a popular show like that needs money, they were probably millionaires already with sponsorships. Why are we pretending these people are poor or need help to survive?
More ›