Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vanschelven
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
It's not strictly true, but the distinction between the truth and the assertion is small enough that the ICC itself draws the conclusion that Microsoft didn't yet: https://www.techradar.com/pro/the-internation
62.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
And here's John Carmack on the subject of 1000s of lines of code in a single function: http://number-none.com/blow/blog/programming/2014/09/26/carm...
63.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
in the same vein as http://developerexcuses.com/ (and presumably many others)
64.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
This writing made me curious enough to click the provided citation though, and I'd have to say "monkeys" is really being kind if we take into account the combination of code quality issues, lack of surrounding process, and _w
65.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
It's a shame that the actual attack mechanism doesn't seem to be detailed on the github repo, and the link to the article is dead.
66.
▲
by
vanschelven
11mo ago
"when an LLM costs less, works faster and makes less mistakes"... indeed, but it doesn't follow at all that it's the fate of all programmers _now_... at least in my experience none of these things are true ATM.
67.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
"it can deal"... with 300 events/s easily.
68.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
I personally find "something like sentry" (but better) so easy to set up that I use it even in local development. So definitely at launch... I wrote about it here: https://www.bugsink.com/blog/local-developmen
69.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
You might want to reconsider ”no data ever leaves your machine" from the post :) Given your target market, have you considered looking at Bugsink?[0] sentry compatible. still not local, but at least you won't have to additionally
70.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
I do take this seriously (see link in my profile), but have to admit that doing so isn't an automatic entry tickets to places like the DoD
71.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Both those things can be true at the same time: all software used to ship like that, and shipping like that in the current era _is a big deal_. Spoken as someone who's core differentiator is "self hosted" [0] [0] https:/
72.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
HN negativity strikes again. Can't we just read this as "there are 2 wins here: security and performance"? Which is not surprising, but still a GoodThing(TM) right?
73.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
To take matters in my own hand I wrote "tabdouse", a tiny kill-at-high-cpu script: https://www.bugsink.com/blog/tabdouse/ Quite unreliable and more a joke than anything, of course...
74.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Do you mean that specifically a hulucibated text "copyright by not-meta" made it into evidence? Or are you talking about copyright generally?
75.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
I wonder if hallucinated copyright claims (esp. like the ZDF one at the bottom of the OP) will be introduced as evidence in one of the court cases against "big AI"
76.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
This reads like yet another attempt to pathologize perfectly reasonable criticism as some form of oppression. Calling “AI could have written this” a classist slur is a stretch so extreme it borders on parody. People say that when writing la
77.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
I did this basically as a joke but I'm sure security researchers will be able to look at this post and somehow extract an attack vector from it :-)
78.
▲
Detecting LLM‑Generated 404s
(bugsink.com)
1 points
by
vanschelven
1y ago
|
1 comments
79.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Which makes sense because jq, with no options, acts as a formatter by default. (it's about 50% of my jq usage).
80.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
the OP wrote "This is a simple concept, but I've never seen it written down before." Putting on my tin-foil hat: Maybe that's because predictable log volume isn’t in the vendor’s interest. Time-based logging makes usage
81.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
also here, I see now: https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14242
82.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
With the link leading to a 404 (taken down?) this seems a bit hard to confirm... or am I missing something?
83.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Skimming the graphs one would say "it hardly matters" which matches the naive assumption that any advantage would be "arbitraged away" by people spending their time researching such matters.
84.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Missing from the article — which is funny, considering it's written from the perspective of a university student — is how deliberate Sun’s academic strategy was. In 1998 they launched the "Authorized Academic Java Campus" pro
85.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Pointing out the dangers of various tools is something that's is consider "a point" to the degree that there is a special government agency for it in every modern state in the world. This is that, but applied to a specific to
86.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
Dan Luu quoting Joel Spolsky: “Find the dependencies — and eliminate them.” When you're working on a really, really good team with great programmers, everybody else's code, frankly, is bug-infested garbage, and nobody else knows h
87.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
If you feel Sentry, PagerDuty and full observability is overkill you might be interested in Bugsink[0]. I specifically wrote about the "overkill" bit (see the blog) and slack notifications were (finally) just introduced. Disclosur
88.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
I'm thinking of "something like this" myself, would be happy to discuss on GitHub/Discord whatever: https://github.com/bugsink/bugsink/issues/127
89.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
> In house or 3rd party it doesn't matter It does matter from the perspective of privacy, because in one case your vistors deal with one party (you) and in the other case another party (Sentry) is also involved.
90.
▲
by
vanschelven
1y ago
good analogy... but one of the surprises about the big work-from-home shift was that there was an (equally big?) shift back soon after
More ›