v3ss0n

34 ms·

601.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
How about haystack? It exists for long and much better architectured than langchain
602.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
This is wrong in so many levels. You need to learn useState,useEffects in react. You only need to learn how to put {varName} in svelte.
603.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Dell precision 17 inches with 4k for me. Lighter than most gaming laptop and comes with powerful workstation gfx card to run LLMs
604.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Lazydocker is all you need to replace docker desktop
605.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Yeah that's the worst thing docker did
606.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
ChatGpt infused timeline is not considered prime for me.
607.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Authentik and authlia are the easiest for me.
608.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
It's quite cool,but quite hard.
609.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Mainly beca auto formatters. It becomes a habit.
610.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Another problem is use of auto formatters. When I am on phone I expect it to auto format text.
611.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Thanks, hard to format, I was on car while typing on phone.
612.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
- if you have a good hardware , you can easily build digital ocean / aws lightsail like environment with a single install in 5 mins of configuration - A VPS Like experience for both Containers and QEMU - Quick and easy multi-tenancy -
613.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
He is a great guy , i helped debugging ZFSMount problems with him - which causes LXD Container restarts to fail. It was just solved in previous release ( usual suspect , it is because of snap. ) . I would like to contribute on his new opens
614.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
> Great, so we just gotta "ship your bare OS" to prod. Back in 2008 , We ship by DDing the whole disk :D
615.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
None of the mini-framework based on Starlette is close to Django's fullstack facility, but upcoming litestar 2.0 have a lot of features that Django people desires. We have DTO + Repository + Sqlalchmey plugin system , that - just with
616.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Yes litestar have class based controllers since day one , class based views with HTMX/Jinja is also available in 2.0 which is now nearing release. Here is lifecycle management : https://docs.litestar.dev/2/usage&
617.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
K8s is complicated , but Docker (docker compose) solves a lot of problems especially when you are working with a team. Just 5-10 lines of YAML code in your docker-compose.yaml file and it gives you an local infrastructure of db , redis , n
618.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Litestar.dev have a team of dedicated developers , also have similar API to FastAPI. You can watch commit activity and the teamwork.
619.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Traefik would be much better proxy if you are using container based dev. Also Please give litestar a try.
620.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Let us know what do you think ! We have a great community too.
621.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
We haven't test Django ninja in term of performance. But from our experience of Django 4.2 async , Django isn't truly asynchronous yet. Since ecosystem is not asynchronous I am not sure how asynchronous API would benefit from that
622.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
There are thousands of issues which about 30% of them are actual bugs, including some of them are those we found on production and reported, the maintainer wrote a script that convert all to discussion and never looked back, so we never loo
623.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
It was based on starlette first but all functionalities are rewritten ending up in better code quality. https://github.com/orgs/litestar-org/discussions/612 Starlette can be considered pure server framework
624.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
https://litestar.dev is also reaching 2.0 .it is a lot faster than FastAPI yet much better maintained. Has DTO, event and channels, Repository, Service DDD style framework built-in. No promotional commits. I had written the rea
625.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
That i have been planning to build . Would like to contribute if you make it opensource.
626.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
might be previleged , nested , and one other setting i don't remmber.
627.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
That confusion makes lxd underrated. LXD isn't like docker or k8s. It's totally different use case.lets see this way If docker and k8s are fighter jets and bomber role , LXD is the aircraft carrier.
628.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
I gotta try multi node k8s setup for lxd
629.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
LXD use case is totally different from podman, k8$ , docker. It is like building your own digital ocean , for containers (and vms) . It can be used as a container host for docker/podman containers, virtual machine manager for qemu, it
630.
by v3ss0n 3y ago
Arch have it packaged as nonsnap too

More ›