Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ux266478
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
511.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
It was not linear growth. The 70s and 80s were essentially write-offs. Things began to move in the mid-1990s and it has been a continual evolution and process over the last 30 years. Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping's teams all di
512.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
You machine a new part.
513.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> I don't see how a user namespace does not prevent/limit privilege escalation. They only prevent a single class of privilege escalation from setuid usage within the namespace. You can still obtain root using race conditions,
514.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
You answered your own question. Bubblewrap uses namespaces, but not by themselves. They're used in conjunction with other tools to provide a security boundary. Even then, it's not a very good security boundary. A serious security
515.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
If I was actually serious about the security of a system, I'd explicitly use virtualization at-minimum. If all I wanted was a mall cop and was happy to take the risk of misconfiguration or attacks on the kernel I'd probably say so
516.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Linux's namespaces are not a security mechanism. Please do not use them as one.
517.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> This guy makes it sound like he had to come up with these concepts from scratch, and it's some sort of pure visual genius rather than math. But... it's just math. The problem with this kind of thinking is that it encourages t
518.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> Mathematics needs something compilers never achieved: a true bidirectional cycle > Going down the stack: Autoformalization translates intuitive mathematical reasoning into formal proof – the compiler's traditional direction. &g
519.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
The state of man pages in the GNU + Linux ecosystem is just atrocious in general. You can thank the GNU Project for that. In sane man pages that actually care about quality, examples are specified where appropriate: https://man.o
520.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
gaza doesn't even neighbor arabia btw
521.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
I think perhaps it's my fault for how I worded that reply, but to clarify it has scarcely little to do with products at all. They don't matter. I sure hope you still can make your own tools to your hearts desire, but that's n
522.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
If you care about high quality products we can start with the OP article and how this system, which is most definitely not capitalism as intended, has directly entailed this nosedive of enshittification for absolutely superfluous and nons
523.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> If it were enough of a problem that the bad outweighed the good, people wouldn't use it, but yet they still do, so it's not enough of a problem. The problem is that while this is true, in practice it's more like the mand
524.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
LuaJIT is amazing. I find it insane there are no Schemes that are able to match it as a tiny, embeddable scripting language with a JITer. GNU Guile is an absolute gargantuan monster in comparison.
525.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Now instead you have 25,000 lines of code that you literally cannot debug.
526.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> Functional-programming evangelists tend to be on the stricter side, though. > I think that a lot of the aversion to functional programming advocacy comes from advocates demonizing anything imperative I find these types to often be m
527.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
I'm not sure that your objection puts anything to rest, least of all a "cargo cult mentality". You re-assert exactly what I say just to disagree and miss the rest of the post. Codebases which are not written in a functional s
528.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
I see this misconception a lot. Functional programming has nothing to do with mutability or immutability. Just like product types (or associative arrays) don't make for object oriented programming, the paradigm is about the patterns yo
529.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Plymouth is harder to identify. It's not just the Puritans at Plymouth, nor exclusively New England. It's merely everything that came with the second colonization. The Dutch are a foundational part of Yankeedom. In fact, New York
530.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
I think a good introductory text on the deep nature of the divide in America is We Have the War Upon Us by William J. Cooper. It's mostly a book about the civil war, but it introduces some post-revolution pre-war history and names. T
531.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
He isn't calling the claim subjective, but underlining what the claim posits entails that we live in subjective realities.
532.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> As an American, it came as a surprise to me that we do not, in fact, have broadly shared values about our system of governance. It shouldn't, America is two very distinct nations. The shape and nature of those nations vary wildly
533.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Oh I hadn't heard of Ante before. This looks very close to the language I wanted out of Rust. Haskell's module system, row polymorphism, linear types, no sepples glyph soup. That's an instant bookmark save. Will be watching t
534.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Koka[1] jumps to mind as a language built around effect types. Without having used Flex or Koka, I'm not sure how their effect types actually differ from the normal monad gauntlet you get in pure languages. [1] - https://kok
535.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
Nothing of what you quoted is incorrect.
536.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
As a professional user of Prolog I'm feeling pretty smug over this morning's coffee.
537.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> We have railways running from West -> East, why not include power lines that can take power from energy farms in the West -> East? Firstly, there is no such thing as an infinitely scaling system. Secondly, because power transmiss
538.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
However the radically different architecture of Wayland may necessitate a rewrite well beyond what the maintainers of a window manager feel is easy. Even accounting for wlroots, you're not exactly just running sed on a glob. And unfort
539.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
480 Mbps is plenty for low GHz signals. 1GHz gives you 20MHz to play with, which turns into about ~100 Mbps max. A 6GHz signal pulling out all the stops will give you at ~1.6Gbps, but if you're dealing with data that extreme you'r
540.
▲
by
ux266478
1y ago
> the irrigation and suitability for farmland of central California The unsustainable irrigation that's draining aquifers during droughts and causing permanent damage[1] to groundwater retention? The irrigation that's causing c
More ›