utopiah

23 ms·

421.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Mandatory "FSD next year!" /s Teasing aside can you imagine how fucking scary it must be to be in a self-driving car that drives straight in flowing water? Damn.
422.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Well a lot of people have that in their garage, even "worst" it's on wheels so even easier to steal. I'm not saying it's worth it just that it's not such a crazy amount in comparison.
423.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Privacy of what in this case?
424.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Doubt it, feels basically like just an ad to get attention "Oh look, that's where the magic happens" vs running their code on existing infrastructure and thus just showing the results, like everybody else. This "feels&qu
425.
by utopiah 5mo ago
"We should be able to trust that our tools will remain the tools we actually signed up to use." Yep... well that's what free software and open-source is for. You can't trust corporations so you MUST have the actual code.
426.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Right? It's like suddenly people discovered that tools can embody expertise. That's literally what we've been doing for ... our entire existence as a species.
427.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Right, that's why TSLA is worth what... pennies? /s
428.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> free market concept should move the prices down Kind of a radical idea. I did read about that in economy books way back when at uni... but I don't think it's really happening actual. At least my walled doesn't seem to ge
429.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> they're still on the building stage Eh... what's left to build? Actual AI?
430.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> space compute Heard anybody remotely competent about space talk the topic? It's pretty much a literal laugh every time.
431.
by utopiah 5mo ago
No need to be cautious. If a for-profit (because... you know, OpenAI isn't at all what it initially was) huge corporation (again, not a cute startup trying to help humanity) publish anything it's a piece of marketing. Every single
432.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> I am also using these models to accelerate scientific discovery. Yes, they are making all the difference at the frontier. Can you please expand on how you do so?
433.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Yep indeed, if I discuss with you I want YOUR opinion. If I wanted a generic opinion... I wouldn't bother you.
434.
by utopiah 5mo ago
And yet... it means absolutely nothing. One can say the most profound thing in 3 words, slowly or fast it does not even matter, and can also spout absolute senseless garbage in billions of words at absolutely ridiculous speed.
435.
by utopiah 5mo ago
I'll reiterate my point too then: yes, and that's not new. There are always engineers selling to tech-savvy non-engineers tools transforming a service based on expertise to a product.
436.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> dynamic websites (with user registration, dashboards, integrations with third-party services, etc.) What do you think a CMS is?
437.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> digital marketing people who were "tech savvy" but had no programming experience who have launched websites that would have cost them thousands of dollars to build. Static Websites have been commoditizatized for decades now.
438.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> vision only is better since Lidar pollutes the sensor fusion data. Did he never experienced optical illusions? I don't get it.
439.
by utopiah 5mo ago
> explain to me why developers should act like monks who've taken a vow of poverty? The devs built something valuable, they should profit from it. No, don't bully others into a fake argument about your weird fantasies. They nev
440.
by utopiah 5mo ago
"I’m not anti-AI. I use these tools daily and have shipped more with them in the last year than in the five years before it. [...] Software Engineer at Google working on Google Cloud and Gemini." The things he must have seen.
441.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Right, but proprietary software is still consider a serious option for security and privacy? What a joke.
442.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Yes... that's the joke, that's what the trailing "/s" was for. I also noticed they said "I" in their reply.
443.
by utopiah 5mo ago
OK hundreds of billions with more than ~200B disclosed for OpenAI, more than ~50B for Anthropic and I have no idea how much in terms of infrastructure from Azure, other neoclouds, NVIDIA, etc. It's honestly hard to keep track of "
444.
by utopiah 5mo ago
It's like witnessing a rocket using the most powerful engine on Earth then once it escaped orbit turn off the engine and said "It is flying without power!". Yes, sure, right now it is ... but that's NOT how it got here.
445.
by utopiah 5mo ago
I disagree, I think the visuals, Gantt charts, are precisely the kind of "PM speak" that can be understood. Sure it won't solve anything as long as C-suite and investors do innovation signaling but that itself can only last s
446.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Security through obscurity is about not revealing how the system works. Relying on computational complexity is precisely the opposite, you can understand the entire system but the unknown is well known, e.g. the length of the key and which
447.
by utopiah 5mo ago
That's what you assume the intent of the author is, I asked WhateverGPT and it confirmed that it was definitely pro-AI! /s
448.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Nice, now instead of just reading slop you'll soon be able to experience slop Worlds, in 3D! /s It's honestly impressive, on the surface. The visuals are gorgeous... but it's still empty. What makes a "World" a
449.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Sure, I don't know how to make it work. I just know that DeepBlue didn't kill competitive chess. We simply have at least 3 different rule sets, namely - no computer assistance, which does also mean no mobile on competition, human
450.
by utopiah 5mo ago
Innovation signalling.

More ›