Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
userulluipeste
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
69 ms
·
661.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
It' just a matter of efforts involved. I don't see it very promoted in the open-source community, but it should! That's the thing that will set free the masses owned by Proprietary Software. The Linux is fine, but it's used mostly as free e
662.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
When ReactOS will hit a stable version, it will be the end of Microsoft! Or at least of the Microsoft as we know it!
663.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
The only real thing that is required is functionality. And it will be most likely the only thing that will stand in time (among many other things that any given useful application might have). The author, the target platform, the product ph
664.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
I'm a romanian and I knew nothing about it. It seems to be illegal only for governmental use because of the lack of accountability. If you think about it, it make sense. "WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTAB
665.
▲
Which is the biggest thing to get into?
(programmers.stackexchange.com)
1 points
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
|
0 comments
666.
▲
Which is the biggest thing to get into?
(stackoverflow.com)
1 points
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
|
0 comments
667.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
It's impressive, indeed! I guess they use some feedback loop when recompressing, because there doesn't appear to be no quality loss, even on the smallest details. I've tried one file of 1.4MB of an Australian nature landscape. Recompressed
668.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
The problem as it appears is the abuse, not the notation itself! Too long prefix? Keep it shorter! Too hard to pronounce? Then don't pronounce, at least don't pronounce the prefix, pronounce it's name and (optionally) the long title that th
669.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
It's not about faith. It's about reality. Like many others, I'm tempted to go carried away by my enthusiasm and believe in something without much reasoning. Actually I did this in a number of times. It just didn't worked very well for me in
670.
▲
Doubts about the Linux mainstream adoption
(compuforums.org)
2 points
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
|
2 comments
671.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
Let's pay respects with silence! :)
672.
▲
The US-Anglo-French plan to civilize the Internet
(arstechnica.com)
2 points
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
|
0 comments
673.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
Hello. Maybe this is the last thing you want from others, but I'll say it - I'm sorry for you. Although I, like many others, have been in situations somewhat similar, I have to admit that it doesn't match the depth level. Therefore what I'l
674.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
I've asked myself (like many others I think) - which is the most "efficient" PL? From this article it can be concluded that it's not so much the language itself like it is the compiler implementation. And programming in assembly is just stu
675.
▲
by
userulluipeste
15y ago
Like Tyrannosaurs said ( http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2555785 ), it depends on the nature of the start-up. "thinking in the shower" might work when it is about finding solutions to problems (although kids are rarely that demanding
676.
▲
by
userulluipeste
16y ago
I think after "Vision Studios", it was pretty clear what is there and the Jaimy's Visual studio 2000 had to be a rhetorical bitter joke ...that was then completed with "better" one like putting the cherry on the top of cake.