uolmir

5 ms·

31.
by uolmir 3y ago
I think this can be seen as a change to acknowledge the need for context in order to make a robust (and hopefully correct) argument for possible evidence of life (fossil, trace, or otherwise). In all likelihood you're not going to find
32.
by uolmir 3y ago
Low content reply I know but it's great to see ICAP having the mindshare to appear in this discussion on HN. It's such a great paper and concept. I also think it has a lot to offer practitioners by making "active learning&quo
33.
by uolmir 3y ago
I hadn't seen that, but I was going to recommend this recent paper: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15291006211051... At a glance of the medium article, they seem to have the same perspecti
34.
by uolmir 3y ago
From everything I've read Valve has exactly the same problem. Stack rating isn't immune. New features still get rewarded the most.
35.
Moon-forming impactor as a source of Earth's basal mantle anomalies(nature.com)
74 points by uolmir 3y ago|37 comments
36.
by uolmir 3y ago
A plain language press release is also available here: https://news.asu.edu/20231101-asu-researchers-discover-earth...
37.
by uolmir 3y ago
It's always great for more people to know this. As another comment said, this is in no way "new" information. In fact, it may be interesting for you and others to read about the long study of organic compounds in meteorites.
38.
by uolmir 3y ago
It's not efficacy data exactly but there was a news article a while back with some interesting perspectives on implementation. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/26/technology/newark-schools...
39.
by uolmir 3y ago
This mistakes quantifiability with ease of measurement.