Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
unselect5917
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
31.
▲
by
unselect5917
1mo ago
I know the Brave browser can be set to always request the desktop version of the site. Whether or not the website respects that or not may vary. And yes, on iOS. It's also effectively youtube premium for free as in beer. Lovely browser
32.
▲
by
unselect5917
1mo ago
>Our current admin is simply awash in corruption Every administration since JFK has been awash in corruption. No exceptions. America hasn't had an America-first President since JFK. The people who obsess over Trump need to read 1984
33.
▲
by
unselect5917
1mo ago
What has reddit ben spewing out that has you in such an altered state, divorced from reality?
34.
▲
by
unselect5917
1mo ago
I've seen the video. He literally didn't. I will not ignore the evidence of my eyes and ears just because you irrationally hate the man and cannot be honest about him. >He contributes to this understanding by straight-forwardly
35.
▲
by
unselect5917
1mo ago
It's not a reductionist statement. You just hate the fact that it's true. Just like "politically incorrect" things. And again, I didn't reword what he wrote. I deduced it myself from first principles. Because unlike
36.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
It's neither an Elon quote nor a logical fallacy. I came up with it myself all by myself. Seek help for your MDS.
37.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
This is the first I'm hearing of this. I can barely get it to generate tame things that aren't porn half the time.
38.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
That's how it should be. A human being must be in the loop and that human being must be accountable for actions that potent. This is actually a new pet hypothesis I've been testing against the various horrors beyond my comprehensi
39.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
Interestingly, deleting this line "fixed" it: >The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated. Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a d
40.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
>I don't understand why a police cruiser can sit in a public space (or even a private one) and write down licence plates and descriptions of passers-by with pen and paper, or record everything around them with dashcams and bodycams
41.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
It's wild that redditors still believe this.
42.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
I have. Why do you put faith in anecdotal evidence and a sample size of one?
43.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
A perfectly safe panopticon and freedom & privacy will always be at odds. Don't let a classic "think of the children" appeal to emotion short circuit your reasoning.
44.
▲
by
unselect5917
2mo ago
>You read along with the text and things seem to be going fine until all of the sudden it starts arguing against a position that no one has actually taken and which doesn't feature elsewhere in the text at all. Then it drops that an
45.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Many here mistake passive aggressiveness for civility. So does the rule enforcement.
46.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
I once ham-fistedly tried to allude to a similar concept. That slaves were at least "kept" while today's wage slaves have more responsibility, and de facto less freedom due to 'The Matrix' that is our financial and
47.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
I meant ublock origin. I use firefox and brave pretty interchangeably. Firefox is better in some ways but utterly infuriating in others. Fun fact: internet speed tests have been reliably faster in firefox for years for whatever reason. And
48.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
I use Ublock on Brave (chromium). Ublock is supposed to be unnecessary with brave alone, but I use it all the time to delete annoying UI elements mostly permanently. Why anyone still uses vanilla Chrome for personal use is beyond me while b
49.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
The fact that lawyers dreamt up the notion of "Imaginary Property" called it "Intellectual Property" and built a business around the scam for themselves, and other people take it seriously is some of the most compelling
50.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Why is that better?
51.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
I wrote an email to my titanically incompetent leasing office mostly to vent emotions, then sent it anyway so I could receive proof that they had read it in writing for any future issues. It was quite cathartic.
52.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Nothing but ad hominem attacks. Go back to farLeftSky.
53.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
The 'curated collection in a light bulb' in your strawman fallacy contains books you could find prominently displayed in every mainstream bookstore's entranceway. Hardly banned by any reasonable definition. Pilpul not withsta
54.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Are there black, Asian, jewish supremacist, or zionist books that are banned? If so, which ones? >There is one reason someone would do that. You're a white supremacist and a Nazi. There's no in-between here. How about you fuck
55.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Less than 8% of the English speaking world has heard of the Bolsheviks' genocide. And we know that's not an accident because Mossad's Robert Maxwell owned the dominant textbook publishing company in America for years. If that
56.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
>Y'know, there's really only one reason to be coy about whether you agree with Neo-Nazi propaganda. Straight to the ad hominem attack on taboo thoughts. Transparent. If the books are true what is your problem with them? Not me.
57.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
>- The Camp of the Saints >- Culture of Critique >- The Turner Diaries Actual banned books. So of course your comment is flagged. Groupthink censorship is still censorship.
58.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Relying on the ultra mainstream wikipedia for a banned book would be hilarious if it weren't so deeply disappointing. They'll list nothing interesting.
59.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
I'd be interested in the banned book list. A glance at the socials with the biggest one missing suggests there will be no interesting books on it. Just the ones you can find in "banned books" stands at mainstream bookstores.
60.
▲
by
unselect5917
3mo ago
Deflection + ad hominem attack + outright lies. Local maximum of bad faith dishonesty. Impressive, really that you get away with it here. This isn't reddit, twitter, or farLeftSky.
More ›