unsafecast

9 ms·

61.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I _think_ it's better. For me, it's still a bit weird when you're scrolling past the first one, but I think you just need a hint or something that the region is scrollable (my confusion comes from the fact that there needs to
62.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I have no idea if it's related, but on chrome on my phone most of the page was solid yellow. Took a while to realize I'm supposed to scroll and the things show up. I don't like this 'trend' of the things appearing w
63.
by unsafecast 4y ago
The border radius thing is insane. Why does rounded corners mean correct?
64.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Ah, so _will_ be. Thanks a lot, looking forward to it!
65.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Write one! Forths are so simple that you can write one in minutes if you understand it, and a bit more if you don't know anything about it. Having your own forth is both really gratifying, and gives you an opportunity to play around wi
66.
by unsafecast 4y ago
From the FAQ: If a BookReader edition is available, you can read it instantly online by clicking the "Read in Browser" link. You're done! Borrowing books in other formats will require Adobe Digital Editions or ebook soft
67.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I love the idea. I want this to be a common thing. I don't like the use of adobe here though. It's a closed platform. It's controlled by adobe. And unless you want to use a browser, you also need an adobe id. I get that publi
68.
by unsafecast 4y ago
> To continue on this topic, blue light filters may look pleasing to some but it’s not sure whether they do have an effect I don't know if they have an effect or not, but I much prefer having it on. It feels easier on the eyes. Wh
69.
by unsafecast 4y ago
This one has pretty bad mobile UX. The horizontal padding is humongous.
70.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Simple blogs should need nothing but HTML to look decent. Better browser defaults would go a _long_ way.
71.
by unsafecast 4y ago
> C uses the stack pointer a lot if you use a lot of stack-local variables. Mark all your stuff "static" and it will use immediate addresses instead Yes, but optimizing compilers are decently good at using registers instead, wh
72.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Ha. In some areas it's actually safer. Very good null safety and static typing are two obvious things. It also has memory leak and corruption detection in debug builds, and it's surprisingly accurate. For leak detection it's
73.
by unsafecast 4y ago
These are issues for the operating system to care about, not every single application. With pledge and unveil (or similar), you can solve most of this once.
74.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Not if the entire editor is untrusted. This is the job of the operating systems, and simple mechanisms like pledge and unveil can solve most of this.
75.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Yes. Some people (myself included) enjoy "unsafe" languages like C. I'm not one of those people that argue that being careful is enough. For applications where security really matters, _please_ use something with a bit more v
76.
by unsafecast 4y ago
This is more about the product though
77.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I _love_ this style of tutorial. It really does feel like a Lego book. Amazing.
78.
by unsafecast 4y ago
For big pieces memory at least, a lot. I was talking to someone the other day about this, they said that in their kernel, switching to huge pages for mapping physical memory made the boot faster by a factor of 10000. I don't have the m
79.
by unsafecast 4y ago
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list The majority of the bugs I see are failed tests, null dereferences, unreachable code reached, very slow code, UI bugs, crashes, etc. Come to think of it, I&#x2
80.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I watched it go for like a minute before realizing that I can actually interact! I love this.
81.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I agree. I like the idea of semantic HTML with close to no classes, but the standard is really failing here. I generally just use <em>, and very rarely <strong>.
82.
by unsafecast 4y ago
It's actually for "bring attention to" :) https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/b
83.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Yes, I hadn't considered e-bikes when I made that comment. Definitely changes things.
84.
by unsafecast 4y ago
I don't. I just compared my perception on how I and other people accelerate with the width of the road. Intuition tells me it's not dangerous (of course, assuming everyone is responsible). Now that I think about it, it depends on
85.
by unsafecast 4y ago
If you come at a complete stop anyway, it's fine with me. Bikes can't accelerate all that quickly, so it ends up being pretty slow traffic.
86.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Basically, before this you couldn't have generic types in traits, like this: trait X { type Y<Z>; } You couldn't express "a thing that contains another thing" in one of those type expressions b
87.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Maybe they meant EQ?
88.
by unsafecast 4y ago
> buggy well-intentioned, cooperative software that could have bugs Ugh, that's what I get for not reading before clicking submit...
89.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Unfortunately not. Pledge is _awesome_, but it's a different thing. Pledge protects the system from buggy well-intentioned, cooperative software that could have bugs. What's needed is something that protects the system from ill-in
90.
by unsafecast 4y ago
Interesting. Never heard of this.

More ›