Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
unishark
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
87 ms
·
421.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
More snark? Presumably people are referring to the active attempt to make someone suffer consequences as canceling too. for example the electrician who got fired would still be described as a victim even if he later got his job back. Though
422.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
The article says it's unusual. I gather this must not be a public company yet for it to even be possible. In the US, by the way, pensions for around 97 percent of people have been replaced by 401k's, a kind of brokerage account fo
423.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
So she's an extremist? If she wasn't cancelled does she deserve to be? Seems like you're trying to have it both ways here. We were talking about what it takes to get someone cancelled. I'd say the uproar that ensued qual
424.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
> Or is what you mean by "cancelled" is that a lot of people said mean things about her on Twitter? Generally, yes that is what I and much of society means. An organized bullying campaign that tries to destroy someone to enforc
425.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Do you think JK Rowling was not a real example? Or that she deserved it?
426.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
What about someone who thinks males and females are biologically different? Or that surgery can't change that fact? The line keeps moving. I see people even on this forum attacking others in the worst language for opinions that look ma
427.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
The poster was talking about hackers exposing anons however. The Disney example doesn't need to prove that particular facet of the danger can happen because we already know it can. So you think Disney would acted differently if they kn
428.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
The US govt already requires publicly funded publications be shared publicly. Some agencies like NIH and DoD have their own archives you need to put the article in. The law allows up to something like a limit of one year paywalling.
429.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
They're effectively giving them a price below the going market rate though, and they can choose to raise that price any time. It would be more messed up for the govt to step in and insist they need to continue selling at their arbitrar
430.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
> And services (data, power, food, support, healthcare, education) are often far below standards typical on the coasts / near major metros. I think you're combining the worst of opposite ends of the spectrum here. When services
431.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
I think ethics is important and it's admirable to help others during a crisis, both as an individual and as a company. But I don't think this kind of stuff belongs in research. If you want to bias or overrule your algorithm to per
432.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Presumably it would only cost a penny because whoever buys it doesn't expect to collect very much and will be motivated to negotiate. It would be really nice if rather than taking a low amount they sell it directly to the debtors thems
433.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Someone did this in the aftermath of hurricane Rita I believe. They rented a uhaul and bought some generators, and drove halfway across the country to sell them to people the very next day. Then they got charged with price gouging. Restrict
434.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
There's also the allure of the local restaurant/store/etc versus the national chain, that everyone can see all around them even in the present day.
435.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
I don't think they're great, it seems like a way of obfuscating what the app really does. Your approach might work for savvy or paranoid users, but not everyone notices much beyond "contains ads" or such. Apple needs to
436.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Because when you're talking to them directly you ask them about it. This is what I mean by all forms of feedback. I'm getting the impression that people are just ignoring all advice about communicating with customers in their star
437.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
One goalpost at a time please. 90% of users in "a given country" is not the same things as saying 90 percent of all users. Unless that country is so important that it's everyone, and again you needed to test that your product
438.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
It's confusing but "the University of California" as used here actually refers to the entire system of ten schools, from Berkeley to, uh, Merced. The system collectively negotiates for journals. There was also a big fight ove
439.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Your link states you retain the right to do this, but that it may be subject to an embargo period. If it's referring to the allowed embargo period according to US law (which requires all federally funded papers be shared publicly) then
440.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
If you are unable to find out that 90 percent of people can't use a major feature that you thought would differentiate your product, you are missing all forms of feedback, including much more important sources besides analytics.
441.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Yes it's fine if people want to create a new buzzword for some special case. But people act like it's a revolutionary idea that will allow them to finally address unsolved problems (and ergo deserve funding for). "Light field
442.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Yeah was just a comment about how widespread sadism is.
443.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
The comment was about being restricted by sponsorship, not pay. According to public records, the average salary for a visa holder is around 140k at Apple. At that level I wouldn't expect stock and bonus to be particularly earth-shatter
444.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
Well in academia, and generally in research, interviews are about 1.5 days of solid interviews, plus an hour presentation. In normal times, add a good dose of jetlag. I once interviewed at a place that was almost two solid days of 30 minute
445.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
There are plenty of agencies under the president who need to be as independent as possible of day-to-day control by politicians. Especially in law enforcement. Not great if you consider democracy to the be a universally good thing of which
446.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
That isn't quite what they said though, at least in the quoted text. They said they had no plans to block or throttle internet traffic. Regulations can have a broad effect limiting what businesses can do in a variety of ways beyond the
447.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
I'm in a university dealing with this stuff and we get both ends at the same time, they (companies) want more immediate technical skills (e.g. programming) while also complaining that grads don't know their math fundamentals enoug
448.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
> If you're a foreigner it's much harder to get sponsored by a smaller company. I know a bunch of people are essentially "locked in" to FAANG until they get their green card and are chomping at the bit to work on mor
449.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
And wouldn't everyone just switch to the mincab companies, both drivers and passengers, if that's the case?
450.
▲
by
unishark
6y ago
> So this is how you justify it to yourself? Honest question. Sounds more like a loaded question.
More ›