Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
uniqueuid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
No you cannot, see Article 2: Scope
92.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Unfortunately yes, the article is a simplification, in part because the AI act delegates some regulation to existing other acts. So to know the full picture of AI regulation one needs to look at the combination of multiple texts. The precis
93.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
True, but I have a gut feeling that a lot of these thorny issues would come up again: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/3582
94.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Yes but see my sibling comment. When you expand your array, your existing data will not be stored any more efficiently. To get the new parity/data ratios, you would have to force copies of the data and delete the old, inefficient ver
95.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
It's good to see that they were pretty conservative about the expansion. Not only is expansion completely transparent and resumable, it also maintains redundancy throughout the process. That said, there is one tiny caveat people should
96.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Ok so the correlation coefficient for vote share is .048, meaning the R squared or explained variance is .0028 i.e. around three percent. No, monkeys cannot predict vote share . That said, for a paper with such an obvious bullshit design t
97.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
It's so great to see that we finally move away from the thirty year old triple categorization of people, organizations and locations. This of course means that we now have to think about all the irreconcilable problems of taxonomy, but
98.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
And sometimes you find little gems, too! I have a copy of "New Rules for the New Economy" by Kevin Kelly, signed as part of the Global Business Network that he and Steward Brand founded a long time ago. Having read Fred Turner
99.
▲
New sequencer from Teenage Engineering: OP-XY
(teenage.engineering)
1 points
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
|
1 comments
100.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Looks interesting - they even added a pitch bend. But I'm wondering if it's worth the 2.3k euro.
101.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
The promise to implement long-announced and in part contractually guaranteed democratic instruments. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/57873484-freedom
102.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Sure I find it reasonable to disagree on these points. I personally find informed consent to be a very desirable thing, because it aims at the goal of legislation, not at the means. If you think that citizens cannot, should not, or should
103.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
This is not what I meant. Laws are made concrete and understandable through either case law (harder for citizens to anticipate IMO) or through statutory interpretation in civic law traditions. Both (eventually) offer a clear understanding o
104.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
I am kind of frustrated by the widespread misunderstandings in this thread. Laws are best when they are abstract, so that there is no need for frequent updates and they adapt to changing realities. The European "cookie law" does n
105.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Yup, looks like their azure api configuration is just a generic wrapper for openapi in which you can plug any endpoint url. Nice. https://github.com/microsoft/TinyTroupe/blob/7ae16568ad1c4de...
106.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Needs openai or azure APIs. I wonder if it's possible to just use any openapi-compatible local provider.
107.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Although you probably agree: If someone wants to describe politics with a one-dimensional scale, left-right is not so bad. And that's why and how it developed.
108.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Unfortunately it‘s true that most studies are useless or even harmful (limited to certain disciplines).
109.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
It is also not easy if you have many potential covariates! Because statistically, you want a complete (explaining all effects) but parsimonious (using as few predictors as possible) model. Yet you by definition don‘t know the true underlyin
110.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
The real underlying problem is that in your case, genetic variants are not accounted for. As soon as you include these crucial moderating covariates, it‘s absolutely possible to find true effects even for (rather) small samples (one out of
111.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
The best way to talk about this is IMO effect heterogeneity. Underlying that you have the causal DAG to consider, but that‘s (a) a lot of effort and (b) epistemologically difficult!
112.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
"Man, just put it on tape and walk over to that machine to load it there". Sorry, I know such low-effort puns are shunned on HN, but once in a decade I grant myself the permission to not resist.
113.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
That's not true, you commonly have CDX index files which allow for de-duplication across arbitrarily large archives. The internet archive could not reasonably operate without this level of abstraction. [edit] Should add a link, this is
114.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
I get the use case, but in most cases (and particularly this one) I'm sure it would be much better to implement that client-side. You may have seen in the WARC standard that they already do de-duplication based on hashes and use poin
115.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
That's an interesting question. They only depend on a single library, but I wonder how much code is really their own. I found it curious, for example, that there is a dedicated mp4 joiner (I mean, if you already have ffmpeg, there is p
116.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
The problem is that it's hard to do this in a way that ensures good archival of ALL resources. Bittorrent works well for popular things but fails for marginal content (unless some really dedicated individuals step in.) What the interne
117.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Haha thanks fixed.
118.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
I agree that it's stupid not to take the game-changer of solar and wind (and batteries) into account. Even though I believe that nuclear no longer has a role in energy (fuel sources, disposal, concentration of risk into few small units
119.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
Maybe, maybe not. It's a tiered system - you get the deluge at the unfiltered bottom and a narrower selection the more prestigious and selective the outlets / conferences / journals are. Problem is, of course, that selection
120.
▲
by
uniqueuid
2y ago
It would also be sad to see the scientific system destroyed by a wave of automatically generated papers that no human has the capacity to verify. It's not hard to generate ideas, it's hard to generate reliable and relevant ideas.
More ›