unignorant

46 ms·

451.
Clojure: An Atom Feed in Ten Minutes(ethanjfast.com)
25 points by unignorant 17y ago|1 comments
452.
Visualizing Sorting Algorithms(hatfulofhollow.com)
22 points by unignorant 17y ago|3 comments
453.
Health Insurance and the Power of Reputation(econlog.econlib.org)
1 points by unignorant 17y ago|1 comments
454.
Building a Genetic Algorithm Framework in Clojure (ethanjfast.com)
20 points by unignorant 17y ago|0 comments
455.
by unignorant 17y ago
Thanks for the suggestions -- I agree with you completely. Much of the code can be refactored in some way, and parts of it can be significantly abstracted. I wanted to get something up quickly, so the end result is certainly flawed. But the
456.
by unignorant 17y ago
It was meant to be a pun.
457.
by unignorant 17y ago
Thanks, I will have to find out what is causing that...
458.
by unignorant 17y ago
This was a weekend project, and I am by no means an expert in Clojure (or Compojure). Also, I would be curious to know how it runs in IE...
459.
A Functional Blog In Clojure (ethanjfast.com)
27 points by unignorant 17y ago|9 comments
460.
by unignorant 17y ago
Wow, that's amusing. When I was younger, this was why I would read all sorts of lightweight books on quantum mechanics. I hated the idea of a mechanistic universe, as it did not seem to allow for the possibility of choice. Quantum mechanics
461.
by unignorant 17y ago
Great article -- and its lessons need not apply only to companies and entrepreneurship. From the rather limited perspective constituting my own life, I have found a proactive attitude (coupled with a healthy disregard for "rules") tends to
462.
Penumbra -- OpenGL in Clojure(github.com)
2 points by unignorant 17y ago|0 comments
463.
by unignorant 17y ago
One can agree with (almost) every specific point Krugman makes, and yet disagree with his conclusion. I don't think many economists would claim that free markets offer a perfect solution regarding health care. Rather, they would argue that
464.
by unignorant 17y ago
Maybe I am overly optimistic about human intelligence, but I don't really see a "low water mark", at least in a practical sense -- certainly not anytime soon. There will always be a "least skilled job" in the employment hierarchy. By the ti
465.
by unignorant 17y ago
"they said there was legitimate concern that technological progress would transform the work force by destroying a widening range of jobs" They sound rather crazy... perhaps I am misreading the implication?
466.
by unignorant 17y ago
This research group has made a great deal of progress since the writing of that paper. They have repaired much larger programs (most referenced here are unix utilities) using many more (100s) of positive test cases. As someone who is in a p
467.
by unignorant 17y ago
That's an interesting article, although I don't particularly agree with the conclusion. As an aside, I think "No matter how hefty the investment, the odds of success are high" is a typo. In its context, this would seem to go against the aut
468.
by unignorant 17y ago
I recently asked myself the same question, and I ended up settling on SBCL (Common Lisp). Emacs coupled with SLIME provides the best development environment I have yet experienced. For me, the greatest downside is that the code I end up wit
469.
by unignorant 17y ago
Common Lisp -- because it has begun to change the way I think.