unicron

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   You've obviously never dealt with ancient IE versions and script loading then...
2. 32.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   It's 100% not true. It's also a pain in the arse if you serve everything over SSL like we do.
3. 33.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   That is learning to build web applications. It is different to learning to code.
4. 34.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   It would still be no good. If you drop one, it's dead. If you drop a Barclays PDQ, you pick it up and continue the transaction.
5. 35.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   It's a very complicated application with a huge amount of HTTP endpoints. We're talking over a million lines of code.
6. 36.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   I agree entirely with this approach. Especially when I consider that we're delivering a 350KiB minified Javascript hit on initial load just for jquery and a load of plugins.
7. 37.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   This is a gimmick or a hack. Not much better than what you will see on hackaday.com I did a LOT of POS work a few years ago for small businesses. An iPad/iPhone would be dead and broken in less than a month for most retailers. You need pret
8. 38.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   That appears to be standard practice for "model bound" systems where the internal "domain model" is bound directly to the HTTP protocol. You get this issue with ASP.Net MVC as well on most of the trivially implemented projects out there. Th
9. 39.▲
   by unicron 15y ago

   Can you please allow us to get a sample of what we're going to get before we have to enroll.