unclenoriega

24 ms·

211.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
I'm not so sure about the Jeb Bush presidency. He seems like much more of a policy wonk than his brother. I'm not I know enough to compare him with his father.
212.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
Although it's been switched around a few times, since 1947 the order has been Vice President, Speaker of the House, President pro tempore of the Senate, then Secretary of State and the rest of the cabinet.
213.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
Maybe there's a case for creating a tax credit to release things like this or donate them somewhere like the Library of Congress.
214.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
An editor was going to change it long ago, but he died before sending out the memo. At least that's the story. http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-curse-of-t...
215.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
It seems to me that the only thing that makes this a 'paradox' or is counterintuitive is the idea that a hotel with infinitely many rooms can be full. Is there some math concept that allows this or is it just semantics? It sounds
216.
by unclenoriega 11y ago
Separation of church and state gets a bit murky when there is a state religion.
217.
by unclenoriega 12y ago
Looks like some sort of encyclopedia-style article about the history of child and adolescent sexuality in Europe. I'm not sure why it's here. The citation: Janssen, D. F. (Oct., 2002). Growing Up Sexually. Volume I: World Referenc
218.
by unclenoriega 12y ago
Agree 100%, especially about knowing what you will do with the result before you take a test. FYI, your English is great.
219.
by unclenoriega 12y ago
This reminds me of all the times I've read a passage online where the only indication that the writer wasn't a native English speaker was the apology for the (assumed) poor English.
220.
by unclenoriega 13y ago
As for Sanders, given the two-party system, I would expect a senator left of the Democrats to mostly vote with the Democrats just as I would expect a senator to the right of the Republicans to mostly vote with the Republicans. We need more
221.
by unclenoriega 14y ago
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/681564/1926-sat.pdf
222.
by unclenoriega 14y ago
This is true. The Senate assumes a quorum is present unless someone suggests the absence of a quorum, so as long as there's a designated president, they're good to go. There are several YouTube videos of pro forma sessions where just the pr
223.
by unclenoriega 14y ago
I've heard this argument before, and, while it seems logical enough, has anyone tried to estimate the cost of various procedures under this sort of system? I tend to believe that healthcare would still be too expensive for most people to af
224.
by unclenoriega 14y ago
This seems like a better one: http://politics.slashdot.org/story/13/01/03/1833222/why-we-t...