ulizzle

20 ms·

211.
by ulizzle 4y ago
That's certainly a better heuristic, but then you quickly run into the problem of when the joke is objectively funny but politically incorrect, so people stop themselves from laughing so they don't get in trouble. IMO, A.I., at le
212.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Not one of those jokes is funny. If a real person said that, they'd just get an eye roll, but you know, since it's A.I., it gets a huge pass.
213.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Because "normal" writing (prose) isn't code. The medium dictates the delivery.
214.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Mine was this: Prompt: "Two dogs walk into a bar" Zinger: "The bartender says, "What would you like?" The dogs say, "We're fine, thanks." "After three whiskeys, the first dog says to the second,
215.
by ulizzle 4y ago
We are calling these things A.I, as if they were really intelligent; do they understand the concept of qualia?
216.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Would I pay $15-20 USD for this book? No. But would I pay $2 for it? I don't know, perhaps just for the tech.
217.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Disney being more than a TV channel is obvious, but if you bring that up, you also have to square up that the theme parks have been bleeding money On the first point, then why are analysts still bearing on Netflix and given it a "no-in
218.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Why is digital trying to look more like film instead of the other way around?
219.
by ulizzle 4y ago
But if you look at the chart two years, you'll see how even if it's building up, it's still a steep drop compared to their high point circa in 2021.
220.
by ulizzle 4y ago
If the majority of people are just fine with watching Netflix and Disney+ how do you explain their steep drop in stocks?
221.
by ulizzle 4y ago
Do you disagree that film looks better than digital?