Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ukraineally
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
No air force, because cost-benefit isnt there. Too many things to take them out. Not enough things to drop bombs on. Dont worry, they did airstrike the Navy doing navy things? aka floating there threatening civilians. Army is in terrible di
32.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>People forget the trump white house tried to disuade Ukraine from joining the EU I liked Trump in many ways but... The day of the invasion... everything the democrats ever said were proven true. Trump was clearly starting shit with Chin
33.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>Err..you might want to check your history there a bit more stringently. And say hello to Tibet. Annexation of Tibet: 23 May 1951 Damn it, you're right... that was 71 years ago. Have anything more recent? Other than the obvious move
34.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>So, and I realize all answers will be pure conjecture, what happens if the sanctions work? What's the end game? Can the proverbial tiger be put back in the cage? Literally everyone in the world is hoping the sanctions work. If it d
35.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>Citizen, here. I'm pretty sure, without looking it up, that we have been on internal war footing well longer than 20 years. I dont think i understand exactly. Like the USA has practically always been at war. I do believe right abou
36.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Is nazis in ukraine the same as wmds in iraq? Not really? This is all just history repeating really. Iraq did invade Kuwait of their own accord and fully annexed. UN security council fully condemned and demanded they leave kuwait. https:&
37.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>What are some coping skills you use or can recommend to tackle or just mitigate the impending doom that's hanging over our heads? Mindful meditation seems to be the best. Look up a guided meditation by ajahn brahm. >I've no
38.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Fulcrum is quite unlikely to take down a SU35 1 v 1. But how about, awacs intel, wingman, and how many on the ground pointing G2A at the SU35. Suddenly it's much easier for the fulcrum to take down all those things.
39.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>Not the world community, only the West. Most of the world has no problems with Russia and Russians. Russia hates asians. During the financial crisis in around 2009... Russians were killing racial minorities. There aren't many asian
40.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>I wonder at which point this current hunt for (civilian) Russians only drives them into the arms of Putin. To me it feels petty and ultimately counterproductive trying to exclude every Russian from the world community. This is certainly
41.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
The Russian people are headed into poverty. Many people are effectively unemployed today and still going into work? We don't need war. Russia is burning to the ground and we can just sit back and watch Russia lose the war. Ukrainian fr
42.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
You buy a stock for the future cash flows. Right now, there is no future cash flows by definition. You would only hold onto russian securities if you are taking the bet that Putin falls. Might as well just go buy lottery tickets. Less risk.
43.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Now that the reg force are coming in and their spetsnaz effectively got beaten. They'll be hitting harder sure... but they'll be far less precise. These forces don't want to be there. They will intentionally be attacking civi
44.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
The day before the invasion the amount of propaganda about Canadians all being nazis was insanity. Our PM Trudeau even called a Jewish politician a nazi. He even declared martial law to crush a legitimate protest. When Putin invaded Ukraine
45.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
VERY unconvinced. RIPE's response is all that matters, not mine. Attempting to remain neutral in conflicts like this is important. Leave possible avenues of communication open so that diplomacy may happen.
46.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Is the source code available so that others can host?
47.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Russia has invaded a sovereign nation under propaganda reasons internally. They are banning VPNs because they can't let the people find out the truth. If you setup a VPN and your family is caught connecting. They will be considered an
48.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>Strong disagree. The Russian people are victims of their government too, held at gunpoint from expressing their opinions freely. A sufficiently large crowd might be able to storm the institutions of government, but a lot of people would
49.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>Russia is an authoritarian state where open dissent with the government has repeatedly resulted in being imprisoned or assassinated. It's very easy to say "just go outside and hold a demonstration" from the comfort of a d
50.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>After watching a video where Sergey Naryshkin, the director of russian foreign intelligence service, was visibly stuttering trying to find the right words to answer a simple question by Putin, hoping for his dear life that he didn'
51.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
There are many good Russian people. Chess community for the most part have said no to war. It would seem Russians were misled about this war. The problem with the isolation is that Russians will only get the 1 view from now on.
52.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>plus the actions of a country’s leaders do not represent the entire will of the people If the Russian people don't agree with war. They would show up in the capitals and shut down the country until this problem is resolved. If they
53.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>This whole situation is so surreal and disappointing. I grew up on Star Trek and somehow I just though we had (almost) arrived in a post-war, federation-like world. We know things should be solved with words because otherwise there are
54.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>The radiation thing is not true. Definitely true... public sensors like weather. Well, i guess you could argue belarus claim is dependent on wind direction. The troops at chernobyl though? No question they are fatally irradiated. >Ko
55.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
They seem to be killing an awful lot of civilians looking for those nazis... They are finally moving their reg force in via convoy, but boy does that convoy ever look like amateur hour. Which isn't surprising, the russians who have bee
56.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
There isn't anything in the air for the ukrainians. So they would be only targeting stuff on the ground. Meanwhile the ground will be targeting them. You only have so many flares. So the cost-benefit is probably not there. Not to menti
57.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
Ukraine vs Russia certainly favored Russia, but realistically what does Russia have to show for it? They hold some highways and chernobyl? Maybe a few small things but they have spent what? $100 billion so far? Thats not even trying to acco
58.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
The Russian people will soon be living in poverty. Their country will not function the same way shortly. The Russian Chess community opposes the war and Russia will no longer be competing in Chess anymore. Not to mention how many other spor
59.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>The only reason that I might buy is that it is morally necessary - necessary because we believe in freedom, and Russia is trying to take away Ukraine's freedom to choose their own future. I'm most sympathetic to that argument,
60.
▲
by
ukraineally
5y ago
>“We don’t though.” <—- I agree as far as the U.S. is concerned. Individual rights of American citizens are not threatened. The USA doesn't think it must fight.
More ›