ujkiolp

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   I will defer to your judgment on this as I am not passionate either way and I trust your expertise.
2. 32.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   generalizations, generalizations
3. 33.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   call it whatever, it distracts discussions away from the subject to the way it’s being said
4. 34.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   >It did take maybe a year or so we have normalized this for git - a tool to store versions of text. That’s the problem
5. 35.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   not my experience - almost always some edge case leads me to a git rabbit hole tldr: even if you never plan to use anything advanced, you’ll end up in some weird situation where you need to do something even if you’re in the “95% of the use
6. 36.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   unless you work for hospitals or critical infrastructure, this reaction is overblown and comical
7. 37.▲
   by ujkiolp 2y ago

   Bad solution simply because of information loss! * after STT, there is objectively less info in the storage format * OP cannot take advantage of rapidly advancing OCR tech on the storage * inevitably OP might end up saving the originals “ju