uhhhhhhh

14 ms·

91.
by uhhhhhhh 8y ago
I've got to say I have the exact opposite experience. It got to the point I now don't do apple/iphone support for family. The number of itunes issues, osx keystore issues, technical issues with phones was taking a lot of time
92.
by uhhhhhhh 8y ago
Completely agree with you. The concept that saving ~150 people was "just a part of your job" and nothing special is insane. The fact the pilot did everything right IS commendable, it shows dedication to her job, the skill and know
93.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
You're complaining about one side using wildly misleading and baseless stats, but then turn around and throw out a completely baseless and fairly absurd claim with no attempt to even back or source it, and then claim that because some
94.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
It can be. That doesn't mean it is. Going private allows a company to focus less on shareholder value (its legal first obligation as a traded company save for a legally defendable company charter that counters this in any way, which is
95.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
My understanding is its not taxing, its shift work and the thousands of edge cases across the various gov departments that have evolved their pay systems, contracts/union agreements separately
96.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
The only defense I've seen for that is "You want the company to be big enough to sue when they screw it up"
97.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
24-72 hours is common from my experience, but that likely varies widely and depends on volume and resources. If you're running this in the cloud and properly automated everything, and its not a billing issue, responding and fixing thin
98.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
smtp will eventually give up retrying, and if you're not willing to "always" respond within a few hours, you're going to lose emails.
99.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
As a sysadmin I completely agree. There are a few things I don't run personally because I want them to "always" work, and I can't drop my professional responsibilities to fix my personal email setup during working hours,
100.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Yup 99.9999% ("six nines") 31.5 seconds from wikipedia.
101.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
chaos monkey finally won !
102.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Agreed. I don't have an issue with this, I think what he's doing is great. I'm just a sarcastic twat. If he's at the point where he can focus his career on what matters to him as an artist and not what the fans want in o
103.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Completely this. I recently went on an alaskan cruise with my family. While they all took pictures, I left my camera home and my phone locked up and just enjoyed myself. Not once have I regretted not taking pictures. Like others have posted
104.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
He says signing into an electric microphone while playing an electric or acoustic-electric guitar and standing on a stage in front of the crowd with the sound projected from speakers. Yes, I'm being facetious, but if he REALLY wants a
105.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Based on existing laws, accepting bribes is unethical and usually illegal. There will always be someone willing to bribe you no matter what the penalties are, and going after those who paid bribes will not actually stop that IMO. Companies
106.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
And that should be the company accepting the bribes.
107.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Myself, and pretty much everyone I know buys rags in bulk from thrift stores. They make money off the crappy worn clothes and I get cheap and plentiful rags. Out of style clothes in good shape seems to be the worst issue for thrift stores.
108.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
You most likely wouldn't log it, you'd sign away rights to a company that wants to log it, and they pay you a percentage of profit, or more likely stumpage fees. This would mean that public land would work the same, companies want
109.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
>While they may not have formulated a valid argument, I think there is a valid argument to be made, so I will try. Excellent. Television was a broadcast medium, its increasingly becoming an on-demand medium with streaming services. You m
110.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
They addressed it by waving their hands and insisting its different, that doesn't equate to a valid argument. That also doesn't change that the methods and impacts are all the same, the only difference is scale, which is my point.
111.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Why are we pretending this is unique or new to smartphones. Television has worked this way for a long time, all media and advertising has worked on the same principals. Instead of pretending this is "new and scary", we should be f
112.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
I've been working on ways to combat this. Taking on longer tasks/projects at home, and requiring myself to pace myself/go slowly and focus on details. Also got back into reading more which can take my attention for hours with
113.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
I wonder if I'm using the wrong terms. I call open offices anything from "just tables" without any real dividers to cubicles like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2&#x
114.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
I did read that several years ago, but forgot that linked to some actual studies done on the subject, I'll go back and dig deeper. Thanks!
115.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
From a "supporting startups and other peoples business ideas" your point makes sense, but from a consumer perspective it really doesn't. You're advocating for limiting a companies ability to provide a product to the cust
116.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
Many of those variants are related to the Cavendish or GM, and are not resistant to existing threats. Those that are resistant, without seeds, with similar taste, often have thinner/weaker skins causing more spoilage/loss, lower s
117.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
That sounds like heaven. The constant distraction environment of cubicles severely hampers my productivity. I work from home as often as possible, but even then I'm no longer accustomed to being able to focus on one thing for so long t
118.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
If my recollection serves, when Intel had what was the largest/most expensive recall in the world in the 90's (at that time anyways), their stock still nearly doubled that year.
119.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
When you're building out your DC, its a function of cost relative to performance/power use. I could see new setups may look at AMD over Intel, especially if they're running workloads impacted by the software fix, at least for
120.
by uhhhhhhh 9y ago
I mostly agree, but if we want to be pedantic, this didn't regress something so much as fix horrible performance for 90% of apps and introduced a previous non-existent bug into certain applications due to a non-thread safe bug. The sol

More ›