ugexe

19 ms·

151.
by ugexe 13y ago
He edited his post and my reply doesn't make sense in context now
152.
by ugexe 13y ago
The difference is when your ex releases your key and you are using this system then everybody can read your email instead of just the NSA and the recipient.
153.
by ugexe 13y ago
This puts your email in everyone's hands, it's just encrypted so it probably can't be read without the key (yet). Regular email does not do this.
154.
by ugexe 13y ago
So this allows potential crackers to save every copy of every encrypted email, allowing them to be cracked in the future when there is increased computer power and more advanced cracking techniques/rainbow tables?
155.
by ugexe 13y ago
Not to mention he mocks them for not making huge live changing moves during the small time frame that he actually knew them, and that he actually thinks these clients weren't just casually lying to some kid who brings them their weed.
156.
by ugexe 13y ago
There is nothing inherently secure with you hashing the password to be used as a password. It uses a non dictionary string and has a long (but static) length, ok, but a random number of anything (characters, words, whatever) has variable le
157.
by ugexe 13y ago
I understand how password managers work. Do you understand why a constant length password is bad?
158.
by ugexe 13y ago
I don't want everyone to know the length of my password that's for sure.
159.
by ugexe 13y ago
Making all the passwords the same length makes this essentially pointless.
160.
by ugexe 13y ago
I don't get this. Are you saying someone who is a hypocrite 1% of the time is equal to someone who is a hypocrite 99% of the time?