uallo

16 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   > It's relatively easy to constrain all children, but CSS doesn't really have a mechanism to selectively constrain some children. Yes it does. You can use .wrapper h1, .wrapper p {} or soon .wrapper :is(h1,p) {}
2. 122.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   Thanks! Subscribed.
3. 123.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   Seems nice. I would subscribe to a feed, but not to a newsletter.
4. 124.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   Yes, it seems every other URL is the same as the one before.
5. 125.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   > will likely be the de facto standard if/when the majority of projects and tutorials use it. Why would you think that? To me it sounds like a completely unbased opinion and goes agains everything that I read in the v3 documentation
6. 126.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   > backlash against Vue 3 What backlash against Vue 3? I know that there were very passionate discussions about several different RFCs that eventually lead to the current Composition API. But as far as I can tell, the current Composition
7. 127.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   > "CSS gets a new conceptual version every few big modules" Where in the article does it say anything like that? The article does not present any decision in that regard at all. It summarizes the history of CSS and the discussi
8. 128.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   They attached a description of their methodology in the "Resources" section.
9. 129.▲
   by uallo 6y ago

   > I am wondering how did they get their data especially for Switzerland. Here most of the plans have unlimited GB, so getting the price of a single one is quite tricky. Not sure where you get that impression, but I don't think it i
10. 130.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    There is also the open source https://devdocs.io/
11. 131.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    > [...] acquiring new tech ventures that could be seamlessly integrated into its product catalog as self-standing revenue-generating streams. ProtonMail would be a perfect match ideologically and probably also financially. But I guess th
12. 132.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Because they are less revenue-oriented and more interested in an open Internet than Mozilla? (They probably are not.) Maybe there are other reasons for your switch, but the citations you replied to don't explain or even justify that st
13. 133.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    MDN is a Wiki. Everybody can contribute.
14. 134.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    OP might be referring to "Trump derangement syndrome": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome
15. 135.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    I use it in a side project. Reasons: * B2B. The project is targeting companies where everyone relies on email. * It is easier to implement. Compared to normal email/password-based authentication systems, it is almost exactly like the e
16. 136.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    I was assuming something like that. Very shady.
17. 137.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    It says "Your account is suspended and is not permitted to send Tweets". Why would they need to verify a phone number? I did not give them one.
18. 138.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    I created a Twitter account close to a month ago and it was immediately suspended because it "appears to have exhibited automated behavior that violates the Twitter Rules". Well it did not really do anything yet, even less so anyt
19. 139.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Sure. But not everybody has them or they might be on that device...
20. 140.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Bitwarden. Works well and the integration with 2FA/TOTP is amazing. I highly recommend to not rely on a single (mobile) device for 2FA. Loosing or breaking it might shut you out of certain accounts forever.
21. 141.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    English with a limitation to ASCII. There are many words in written English or topics that are not in ASCII, though. Subreply also disallows non-ASCII names with "First name should use English alphabet". Unicode should also work (
22. 142.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    > dnt: 0 Yes, that is exactly how it was specified: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DN...
23. 143.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Are you saying that the people working on the engine and the ones working on Pocket are the same? Hint: Probably not.
24. 144.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Then disable it. Judging from comments in this post, there seem to be numerous people who like it. And given Mozilla owns Pocket and a small amount of revenue is coming from it, what is wrong with pushing it?
25. 145.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    > I still find that choice baffling Why?
26. 146.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    > their dev tools are lacking in so many ways when compared to Chrome Like what for example? Please be specific.
27. 147.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    I've been a paying Dropbox customer for over a decade. But I'm also planning on moving away (likely to Tresorit). One of the things that really piss me off is that they still do not have a (good) way to avoid files from being sync
28. 148.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    This is exactly what StackOverflow highly encourages new users to read before asking questions: https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask Sadly, some/many don't and then complain because the community is &q
29. 149.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Neither updating a question nor closing/close-voting gains you any points. When that happens to you, did you add a comment telling others why it is not a duplicate? In my experience most people don't and if they do it is just a co
30. 150.▲
    by uallo 6y ago

    Firefox has been providing amazing developer tools for a long time already. In some areas they are better than Chrome's, and vice versa. Just give it a try and see for yourself.