Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
u801e
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
That's true, but they still assess fines and court costs. A lot of people will actually opt to pay an increased fine to avoid having demerit points on their license. This is because they know that the demerit points will affect their
212.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
Is we wanted to remove the revenue aspect, we could eliminate fonts and court costs for traffic violations and just rely on license demerit points. If one accumulates enough demerit points within a given time frame, then their license is su
213.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
It's a lot easier to change the way one rides than it is to change society to match the norm in another country. I ride in traffic using the full lane and have been doing so for close to 20 years, riding several thousand miles per yea
214.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> 1) I'm invisible, no car can see me and no matter what I do to make myself visible a car will ignore my presence and drive through me If you try to ride in a way that you're not noticed (off to the side, behind parked cars, u
215.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> I scan the entire intersection (from an elevated view standing up on my pedals, without any pylons or mirrors obstructing my view as in a car) and note that there are no pedestrians in or entering the crosswalk, and no motor vehicles a
216.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> it was a reasonable assumption that "driving", in this case, was referring to operation of a motor vehicle. Florida law[1] defines a vehicle as follows: >> (106) VEHICLE.—Every device in, upon, or by which any person or
217.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> No, they are blocking the next lane. Lanes are sized to hold a single automobile. Half of an automobile will clearly block another automobile from filling that space. This is not lane-splitting. According to the Wikipedia article you c
218.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> I assume you’re going to continue finding way to blame cyclists for road issues Where have I blamed cyclists for road issues? > rather than consider that the issue is more complex than cyclists = bad? > that just means US road pl
219.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> Therefore the law applies to bicyclists as well You left out the second part of the law you cited: >> (1) Every person propelling a vehicle by human power has all of the rights and all of the duties applicable to the driver of an
220.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> Traffic lights prevent car movement, at other junctions the lane is set back, and road is elevated to the level of the cycle lane, creating a natural speed bump. There are virtually no intersections like that in the US where there are
221.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
Not all jurisdictions have helmet laws, nor does every motorcyclist wear a full helmet. Also, turning their head would mitigate the visbility issue, which isn't the case for a motorist.
222.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> I can tell you from experience that the introduction of a physically separated cycle lane on a 30mph road which is part of my commute as reduced the number of close calls I’ve had from every couple of days to zero. What happens when yo
223.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
The law[1] you're referring to says the following: >> (5) No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, except when reduced speed is necessary for
224.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> An automobile that 'lane-splits' to pass a bicyclist isn't moving between two other automobiles They are moving between traffic in the next lane and the cyclist. Lanes simply don't have room for an automobile and h
225.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> It feels unsafe to follow the "rules of the road" on a bike because the rules were created for an entirely different kind of vehicle. The rules of the road[1] were first developed in the early 20th century before motor vehicl
226.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> In my experience, most people don't have a great understanding of what keeps cyclists safe in mixed traffic (i.e. not within a protected lane) There is really no fundamental difference between pedalcyclists and motorcyclists on su
227.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
There really aren't any special rules for motorcyclists pertaining to lane splitting and filtering in the US in most states. The general rule most states have for roads with marked lanes is that drivers of vehicles keep their vehicle
228.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> I think the actual issue is a step beyond that: cyclists are treated as if they were equal to drivers sometimes (e.g., bikes being entitled to the whole lane even if they're going 20 under the speed limit) Unless the road has a mi
229.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> I will make it more technical: a [pedal]cyclist doesn't have an windshield A-pillar blocking part of their view. Neither does a motorcyclist, but no one claims it's safer for motorcyclists to treat stop as yield compared to m
230.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
In the US, most states have a law that requires drivers to be as close as practicable to the right edge or curb before making their right turn. This precludes the possibility of through traffic passing a right turning vehicle on the right.
231.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
I don't really see how banning right on red would address the right hook problem. Right hooks happen when the light is green.
232.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> What's interesting to me is that cyclist injuries went down after these laws were passed. The study[1] where they stated that said it only decreased in the year after the law was passed. They didn't check what happened in su
233.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> A cyclist's head is much closer to the end of their vehicle, and they have a much more unobstructed view around them. By the time they are a few feet from the stop sign, they can already see much further down the street than a dri
234.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> However there is some content that its existence on the platform makes me less likely to use the platform even if I never see it. > ... > /r/jailbait is one of the early examples that comes to mind. It hosted risqué, bu
235.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
>> the [branch] history after the branch is merged > Regular commit IDs do that -- although it stores repos and full history, Gerrit doesn't really care about changeset-id's once they're merged. In git itself, relate
236.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
So, if you implement a feature that involves multiple commits, when you push the branch up, will all the commits in the branch have the same changeset-id? If not, how is the relation between commits on a branch maintained during review and
237.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> So I always try to commit and document as I go. At that point I don't spend a lot of time getting the commit messages perfect, but I make sure they at least have all my thoughts. Before I push up the commits, I'll use "g
238.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
> In squash workflow, the PR is the context and the unit of change. It’s shoehorned onto git only because of GitHub. This could be useful if a PR is essentially changing only one thing like a commit should, but since PRs usually cover a
239.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
I was thinking more along the lines of a conventional bicycle, not an e-bike. The primary problem with DUI is the injury and property damage that others suffer as a result of a crash. This is because of the mass of the vehicle that the DU
240.
▲
by
u801e
4y ago
6. Ride a bicycle If the drunk driver ends up in a collision with a motorist, then the damage to the other party would be minimal. The drunk person also still has personal transportation as well.
More ›