tzmudzin

9 ms·

61.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
Great if it works for them. From the operations point of view every additional layer and every new dependency hurts. [OK, I'm going back to my cave now...]
62.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
Hell, no. With all due respect: KISS.
63.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
> 1. You can't shut down the economy indefinitely. At least not if your goal is to minimize fatalities. It's not a binary choice between life as normal and total shutdown. The whole discussion is about reducing non-essentials t
64.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
> What matters is which one you copied, not the existence of alternate copies. Not a lawyer either, but "I came up with this myself" is the standard defense of the artists, with mixed success.
65.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
„Too big to fail” is the last thing we need. And I’m not sure how the SSL part in consumer-facing part of IT relates to a botched internal data migration.
66.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
You‘re absolutely right, but we all can be talking about different subjects here: - database restore - database migration (your case) - data migration to a different platform and presumably different data model (the bank‘s case, or my answe
67.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
That‘s a good start, but may even be an overkill for your goal. The trick is not in the application of highly complex SQL. The trick is in the PROCESS — making it robust, testable, traceable, and reversible for every object despite the comp
68.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
> * "Privacy": I don't see this more private than the information contained on a driver's license. Your DNA tells a lot more about you than the driver's licence. Think about the next step: this time it's the
69.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
Consider viewing this video from the perspective of a close relative of someone killed as "game" in the hunt. Distress can get very real. And if a personal perspective does not suffice -- you don't want to breed copycats.
70.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
You might change your views quickly once you find material published on the 'net violating what's dear to you specifically. I don't know if it's your neighbor's recording of your morning fun in the shower, or if it&
71.
by tzmudzin 7y ago
Sure. Even if the dreaded GDPR requirements actually mean "respect your viewer's privacy", and might benefit locals too...
72.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Presumably, though I bet Mel would be an even better figure here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/story-of-mel.html
73.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
http://www.elib.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Lem.pdf Definitely one of my favorite reads from my youth days...
74.
Bounty Hunt Announced on Swiss eVoting System(onlinevote-pit.ch)
173 points by tzmudzin 8y ago|54 comments
75.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Sure. At the same time there is a difference in voting on a vague concept and voting on a specific agreement.
76.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
I can sympathize with you, as I shared the same woes. Don't torture yourself though. Quite often the ornamental form simply hides the lack of intellectual depth in the content. Free yourself from such thoughts and the rest will follow.
77.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
"The Economist Style Guide" is excellent too.
78.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
> My brain just freezes out whenever I try to write "complicated" sentences which I find extremely irritating. Don't do this. Follow "The Economist Style Guide" instead: "Clarity of writing usually follows c
79.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Bargain prices are at the crash. Beginning of the bear market is by definition the time when prices will continue to decline. (I'm leaving it up to you to decide if it's a short-term correction, beginning of bear streak or anythin
80.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
> This should be restricted to anything making decisions based on personal information, if it is to be implemented at all. Why would you exclude safety-relevant systems, e.g. in the autonomous driving / autonomous flying / indu
81.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
... that already realized there's nothing it can do to stop the terror machine. When you're robbed of everything, and things get worse every day, gallows humor is the only freedom you can enjoy. End even that only in private. &quo
82.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Yes, that's the actual problem.
83.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” ...and someone forgot to adapt the rhethoric.
84.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Short sellers by definition are not shareholders.
85.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
The Dictator's Handbook, by de Mesquita & Smith: https://www.amazon.de/Dictators-Handbook-Behavior-Almost-Pol...
86.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
It certainly looks like that. Not sure it was the wisest move though...
87.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
Are lawyers running their business, or are business decision makers making business decisions?
88.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
... or just the reverse: clearly omitted in all benchmarks, stating you buy at your own risk because of Intel's unwillingness to subject its products to examination. [Sure it's not going to fly given Intel's market position,
89.
The United States finally starts to talk about data privacy legislation(martechtoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org)
2 points by tzmudzin 8y ago|0 comments
90.
by tzmudzin 8y ago
You may have misunderstood me. It's not about not wanting to pay for value -- it's about putting the right economic incentive to promote the behavior beneficial to the general public (and each individual). I paid for my lock, but

More ›