tzakrajs

18 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   I like how you think
2. 122.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Our minds aren't really that special as engineers, we were typically shown a path to engineering from our parents or environment that lead us here. It was a real privilege to receive that pathway. That isn't so say there wasn&#x27
3. 123.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Itanium is why we can't have nice things. (Wishes SGI would have never tried)
4. 124.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Aliens
5. 125.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   I don't see the context that explains that D = death and L = life. Maybe D could have stood for Dark and L for Light?
6. 126.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Exactly and to address the other child comment, those $1k phones have hardware to render AAA games now. Google doesn’t realize they don’t actually have a sustainable audience. It’s sad.
7. 127.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Let’s revisit this in a year.
8. 128.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Stadia has overcome the speed of light, so yes it's a viable product now and needs a response. /s
9. 129.▲
   by tzakrajs 7y ago

   Considering their mission statement about making the worlds information universally accessible and contemporary goals around literary archival it’s not a stretch to believe they had history on their mind.
10. 130.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    This is article so idiotic it makes me hurt. The researcher is quoted in the article saying it’s 10 years out. Blockchain??? AI?? What exactly is the competitive advantage?
11. 131.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    Except Chinese use VPNs and this just keeps them from ever seeing the content now.
12. 132.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    I think it's because that AdSense revenue is so sweet and so easy that nothing else is as interesting to the organization. Pretty difficult benchmark for competing products to show their value. It's like an oil rich nation investi
13. 133.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    Probably passed this bill to convince their spouses not to go digging into their browser history.
14. 134.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    Nice ad hominem fallacy you got there
15. 135.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    The intermediates are not realistic. There are many artifacts and they are obscured by the small, lossy video.
16. 136.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    I feel like this will end up cannibalizing their engineers effort.
17. 137.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    This is how Caltrain works also.
18. 138.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    I wonder how long it takes in game to farm that much ISK.
19. 139.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    This sounds like some grade A projection. His interpretation is sensible and follows from the article. Stop gas lighting.
20. 140.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    Guess this guy was pleased with his slower processor too.
21. 141.▲
    by tzakrajs 7y ago

    Probably not holding it the right way.
22. 142.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    Social justice mammals are going to bring democracy to the rest of the animal kingdom, duh.
23. 143.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    Good thing there isn’t more than one perspective on what is right and wrong. This could’ve been a meaningless platitude otherwise.
24. 144.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    Yeah, I am sure there is some sort of KPI tracking engagement which helped to inform this behavior.
25. 145.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    Three angle of attack sensors should have never been something that could be overridden by cost savings measures. The engineers wanted three sensors and the management said no without ensuring all planes sold had sufficient mitigating contr
26. 146.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    tl;dr: technology in the late 90s and mid 00s gave power to users to be more social on their own terms, technology in the late 00s took power away from users and gave it to platforms to dictate social interaction with notifications It appea
27. 147.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    Except for when it does (which in my experience is like all of the time).
28. 148.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    SysV init was so full of fail (race conditions, no dependency management, slow as hell, stupid metaphors -- run levels? really?) that people wrote Systemd. Anyone can expand on systemd to have it do stupid shit it shouldn't. But you ca
29. 149.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    What I am hearing is “Hey corporations, we have this great open source project and everyone should adopt it (including you!) just don’t try to contribute your changes upstream because they are toxic and serve your dirty, corporate needs. Th
30. 150.▲
    by tzakrajs 8y ago

    I never said they should work for exposure or that they should be happy with this system. Do the corporations creating products with OSS have a more positive impact on the world than when they purchased their software? If so, isn’t that ben