typewithrhythm

12 ms·

151.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
The thing is, you can tune driver assist to whatever form you like; but then you have a true comparison of function with established competitors. I just don't believe the approaches for high autonomy (especially at the time) actually c
152.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
This always seemed like a bit of bull from waymo. It's not an easy problem to work with existing manufacturers to give a better and or cheaper solution... Especially when there are established competitors with efficient verification an
153.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
It's not some big or recent development, effective WFH has been possible since ADSL matured for many, it just took a while for that to be commonly understood.
154.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
Then history repeats itself and the low cost centre needs higher cost support. There is no real special secret in the WFH world that changes this pattern. Tech is special in that there is no real capital barrier to a whole lot of what we do
155.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
This assumes that A) The institutions in the country make it possible to identify good from bad local candidates. B) There are enough experienced people in the region to have a healthy functional workplace. C) The outcome is at least propor
156.
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
Anything dependent on "user generated content" has a capture factor. It doesn't matter if all the apps are slop, people will follow established creators, and new creators will follow an established audience. I suspect the cl
157.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
This ignores a few things. First, I pay taxes, and my perspective is that the wealth created by my labour ought to benifit me. Just because some of that wealth is given to the government to be directed more efficiently, does not mean that
158.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
You have a very unsophisticated comprehension if you are taking funded with taxes to be the same as socialism. The part of the parents comment that was directed at was "Instead of spending money on the people. We are spending it on stu
159.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
Did you read the comment I'm replying to? "Instead of spending money on the people. We are spending it on stupid car centric infrastructure. Forget mental health, social support, universal basic income..." This is a classic
160.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
Not everyone is a socialist, or high density enthusiast. Personally I want the local government to only spend money in ways that result in people being more independent of a dense centre, that allows people to have more control over their i
161.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
Very easy to substitute closed loop steppers, if that's the only limitation.
162.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
Morality really only has relevance to an individual. Was it moral to invade Canada? No, at least not under contemporary morality. Is it moral to give a random subset of people special rights in modern Canada? Is a seperate question, that ha
163.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
I think you are advocating for trying to make the experience of apartment living less shit, based on some idea that density is inherently good. However there is no example where this is the case, as less density always allows individuals m
164.
by typewithrhythm 3y ago
Density spoils many of these examples, being in close proximity to a random collection of people has downsides. Why would I go to a theatre with people who cough and talk, when I can spend a couple of months wage to have a better experienc