ty6853

61 ms·

1. 1111.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   Illegal explosives are also usually NFA tax violations, fwiw.
2. 1112.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   Founders didn't believe rights were derived from the courts or any part of government.
3. 1113.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   You seem confused. The founders believed right to keep and bear arms is god given and recognized this in the constitution as a backstop against tyranny of the courts or any branch of government. They did not anticipate the courts decision
4. 1114.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   The actual charge here is a tax violation (failure to buy a stamp for a short barrel rifle). Not paying $200 in NFA taxes. The precedent is based on a lie the gov itself accidently violated during surplus sales to the public. The preceden
5. 1115.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   You can amend the constitution to allow infringing on nuclear arms. Not super difficult if everyone agrees. Elon Musk has far worse than these explosives just by deorbiting at the appropriately scary trajectory.
6. 1116.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   Tannerite, black powder and some explosives can be legally bought and owned cash and carry. It's quite likely no law was broken and all they found was a questionable pistol brace on a short lower. Remember FPSRussia went down for paint
7. 1117.▲
   by ty6853 2y ago

   Right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You could own cannons and warships when 2a was passed. The real criminal in this case is feds depriving fundamental civil rights under color of law. The failure to register short barrel