ty6853

8 ms·

61.
by ty6853 1y ago
"we should try to make conditions better for everyone such that fewer people are poor" and similar arguments is how the government scams you and everyone else into their racket. You always had the option to give to the poor, you
62.
by ty6853 1y ago
We escaped them because the tenth amendment and judiciary constrained federal powers in non war time to activity summing up to like 2% of the GDP and they needed an amendment to do anything outside of a little box. POTUS was fairly low sta
63.
by ty6853 1y ago
Miller is an excellent, quick witted entertainment and speech writer in his own way. What's astonishing is using what is essentially an entertainer for high level strategy.
64.
by ty6853 1y ago
It verifies the legal status of the documents submitted. Does little beyond encouraging identity theft of USCs that end up with unexpected tax liabilities.
65.
by ty6853 1y ago
I've never been in the military but I was in a civil war. Let me explain what a few days holed up does to a bunch of young dudes with automatic weapons: it makes them eager for an exciting break from the monotony.
66.
by ty6853 1y ago
The real danger of Kent State is it teaches in for a penny, in for a pound.
67.
by ty6853 1y ago
Lol at Katrina the police and guard were going door to door confiscating arms of occupied homes in blatant violation of the second amendment. There is a video if a guardsman bragging about something to the effect 'hoping he doesn&#x27
68.
by ty6853 1y ago
Fun fact, most every adult male citizen under the age of 45 is militia by statute.
69.
by ty6853 1y ago
I don't understand. Was the coast guard deployed? When national guard is nationalized (as is the case here when the state is bypassed), they become part of the army or air force. If Newsom had deployed them instead of Trump, then you
70.
by ty6853 1y ago
Or they are insured, including against loss revenue. If your insurance payout included estimated revenue assuming there weren't riots, then it should be a net positive to operate and just let them burn until they hit their payout cap
71.
by ty6853 1y ago
The libertarian party is the only prominent party I can think of that employs anything close to that as a platform.
72.
by ty6853 1y ago
You're thinking of classical liberalism, which is something the dominating political factions are highly against. The contemporary meaning of conservatism has been hijacked by the Republican party which does not employ any of those go
73.
by ty6853 1y ago
Yes exactly. For example about half my family is naturalized and the other half are jus soli citizens. The naturalized half, most of who don't have degrees and often tell me tales of their coworkers getting deported, are fiercely pro
74.
by ty6853 1y ago
The employers cast votes, illegals do not, seems like an easy calculus. Arrest the illegals to win the immigrant vote. Rationally someone on HN is not going to want to understand this because it is not in their interest to understand it, b
75.
by ty6853 1y ago
We're constantly pitted against one another. Ammon Bundy used actual armed militias to check the power of unelected bureaucrats who were constantly changing up the regulations against ranchers, and it actually worked . Anytime someth
76.
by ty6853 1y ago
People will pay whatever is necessary for water or a bite to eat as well, yet we don't see that phenomenon.
77.
by ty6853 1y ago
The federalists also intentionally slowed and interfered with the mail of anti-federalists to get an upper hand, at a time when it was crucial for their organization. Ultimately, the federalists won. The last kiss of death was circa 1930s,
78.
by ty6853 1y ago
The bill of rights was grudgingly accepted by the federalists. It makes more sense to view the intent of the bill of rights from the lenses of the anti-federalists that actually founded them rather than the founders in general.
79.
by ty6853 1y ago
You're essentially appealing to the natural right to self defense. I'll grant you the constitution isn't a suicide pact -- if people are in imminent danger of death or disability then they or anyone else has a natural right
80.
by ty6853 1y ago
It's even more expensive when the government regulates it to hell and back, intertwines itself with insurance industry, and has an incestuous relationship with the AMA resulting in massively fewer number of doctors than would like to g
81.
by ty6853 1y ago
The 10th amendment constrains federal powers to enumerated powers when acting within the states. This act passed because in the seas the federal government was not so constrained (yes hospitals and offices are on land but the loophole is th
82.
by ty6853 1y ago
There is a constitutional way to remove people, and an unconstitutional way. When the unconstitutional way is intentionally chosen, the agency doing it is an enemy of the USA and we don't have due process to ensure individual rights a
83.
by ty6853 1y ago
Or just more accessible, so the average person can get a piece of the benefits that cartels and megacorp executives already get.
84.
by ty6853 1y ago
These national guard are sworn to protect against foreign and domestic enemies. ICE and CBP have continually conspired to violate the constitution of the united states, and the orders of the courts. Therefore the action the officers and g
85.
by ty6853 1y ago
I don't know of anyone or any form of relativism that thinks dominating a monopoly game is relatively 'the same' as a round to the head, and it's hilarious seeing the 'yass queen' response sister comment had to
86.
by ty6853 1y ago
No you just assumed I did because there is a certain element of self-aggrandizing 'anti-racists' that have groomed themelves to believe anytime someone brings up the IQ test score gap based on skin color, that it's being used
87.
by ty6853 1y ago
You're mixing causation and correlation. Those with genotypes that produce black skin score lower on IQ tests on average but I never claimed the gene caused it and even disclaimed it above: >> nor does it mean the gene itself ca
88.
by ty6853 1y ago
It isn't unscientific to hypothesize that if you give people a certain set of bunk questions that based on some arbitrary scoring system that the differences will appear correlated to genotype, and then test it and find out genotype re
89.
by ty6853 1y ago
You're arguing against a straw man here. No one here is arguing a higher IQ test score means a person or population is more intelligent.
90.
by ty6853 1y ago
Giving a nonsense test to people and recording a correlation between the nonsense score and genotype is science, even if the questions are bunk. Never once have I claimed that the actual test results mean anything in particular -- just tha

More ›