txus

8 ms·

31.
by txus 14y ago
Heh, I really liked the analogy with Postel's law, and I guess you're right. The main criticising I've received about the blog post has been about the swearing, so I guess I could skip that next time.
32.
by txus 14y ago
I don't think that's Rails, or Ruby or whatever paritcular tech we're discussing. I think that's a common trait in human communities, and I'm worried about the one I feel mine, but I'm sure everyone can see a part of their community reflect
33.
by txus 14y ago
If you can't see the point because of the "harsh language" then I apologize, I might publish a politically correct version for you then :)
34.
by txus 14y ago
I didn't need to grow old to watch relatives and friends fighting cancer. I know how serious it is, and I really admire that you're working in that particular field. That said, I used the metaphor on purpose, because of its power, because I
35.
by txus 14y ago
Just like a tattoo, it shouldn't distract critical thinkers when judging the contents and the point of my argument.
36.
by txus 14y ago
I corrected a couple of those upon indication from readers. I hope there aren't any more :)
37.
by txus 14y ago
I didn't mean to give a bad impression of Ruby. I think (and many people have pointed out) that the problems I outline are valid for many developer communities, if not all of them. In the end, those communities are human, and share a good a
38.
by txus 14y ago
But swearing is a personal signature. (Anyway sorry if I offended anyone.)
39.
The Cancers In The Ruby Community(blog.txustice.me)
53 points by txus 14y ago|67 comments
40.
Learning with Terror...VM(blog.txustice.me)
1 points by txus 15y ago|0 comments
41.
Mutation testing in Ruby with Mutant(blog.txustice.me)
2 points by txus 15y ago|0 comments
42.
by txus 15y ago
I insist, this is fixed in version v0.0.5, thanks to your very warning.
43.
by txus 15y ago
On the CSRF concern, which is totally valid, I've pushed a patch. From version 0.0.5 it uses a token to prevent this kind of attacks. https://github.com/codegram/rack-webconsole/commit/d5060d0e8...
44.
by txus 15y ago
You're right, that's a risk. I've opened an issue to implement a simple pseudorandom token to protect AJAX requests. What do you think? https://github.com/codegram/rack-webconsole/issues/4
45.
by txus 15y ago
It is meant for development environments only. Nobody would risk putting a Ruby console in production :) In fact, when using it with Rails, it is loaded only in development environment. With other frameworks you should take care of what mid
46.
Micetrap - a nifty tool to catch evil hackers on the fly(blog.txustice.me)
5 points by txus 16y ago|0 comments
47.
Hijacker - spy on your ruby objects(blog.txustice.me)
2 points by txus 16y ago|0 comments